Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Evaluating Enterprise Content Management Tools in a Real Context
Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- 1 Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- 2 Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- 3 Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- 4 Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- 5 Web Engineering and Early Testing Research Group, IWT2, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Journal of Software Engineering and Applications·Volume 08 (2015)·Pages 431–453·Published 13 August 2015·DOI10.4236/jsea.2015.88042
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Managing documentation in a suitable way has become a critical issue for any organization. Organizations depend on the information they store and they are required to have appropriate mechanisms to support the functional needs of information storage, management and retrieval. Currently, there are several tools in the market, both free software and proprietary license, normally named Enterprise Content Management (ECM) tools, which offer relevant solutions in this context. This paper presents a comparative study among several of the most commonly used ECM tools. It starts with a systematic review of the literature to analyze possible solutions and then it defines a characterization schema instantiated in a particular case, the Regional Government of Andalusia.
KeywordsSoftware EngineeringStandardsMethodologiesEnterprise Content ManagementQuality Analysis and Evaluation
- AIIM (2013) The Global Community of Information Professionals. http://www.aiim.org/
- Alalwan, J.A. and Weistroffer, H.R. (2012) Enterprise Content Management Research: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25, 441-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410391211265133
- THOT Project. http://www.aopandalucia.es/inetfiles/agencia_innovacion_estructura/14122012112320.pdf
- Scott, J.E. (2011) User Perceptions of an Enterprise Content Management System. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-44 2011), Koloa, 4-7 January 2011, 1, 9, 4-7.
- Haug, A. (2012) The Implementation of Enterprise Content Management Systems in SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25, 349-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410391211245838
- Van Rooij, J.C. (2013) Legacy Issues in the Implementation of Enterprise Content Management (ECM). International Journal of Information, 3, 120-123.
- ISO 2709:2008, Information and Documentation—Format for Information Exchange. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41319
- ISO 15836:2009, Information and Documentation—The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52142
- ISO 15489-1:2001, Information and Documentation—Records Management—Part 1: General. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=31908
- ISO 23950:1998, Information and Documentation—Information Retrieval (Z39.50)—Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=27446
- ISO 10244:2010, Document Management—Business Process Baselining and Analysis. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45935
- Zhang, H. and Babar, M.A. (2013) Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering: An Empirical Investigation. Information and Software Technology, 55, 1341-1354.
- Kitchenham, B. (2004) Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University, Keele, 33.
- Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M. and Khalil, M. (2007) Lessons from Applying the Systematic Literature Review Process within the Software Engineering Domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 571-583.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009