Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Reduced Complexity Quasi-1D Viterbi Detector
National Institutes of Technology (NIT), Bhubaneswar, India
ITER, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, India
Konark Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Bhubaneswar, India.
- 1 National Institutes of Technology (NIT), Bhubaneswar, India
- 2 ITER, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, India
- 3 Konark Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Bhubaneswar, India.
Journal of Signal and Information Processing·Volume 02 (2011)·Pages 26–32·Published 22 February 2011·DOI10.4236/jsip.2011.21004
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper develops a reduced complexity quasi-1D detector for optical storage devices and digital communication system. Superior performance of the proposed detector is evidenced by simulation results.
KeywordsChannel equalizationViterbi Detector
- S. V. Halunga, N. Vizireanu and O. Fratu, “Imperfect Cross-Corelation and Amplitude Balance Effects on ConVentional Multiuser Decoder with Turbo Encoding,” Digital Signal Processing, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2010, pp. 191- 200. doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2009.05.007
- B. Li, et al., “A Novel Parzen Probabilistic Neural Network based Non-coherent Detection Algorithm for Distributed Ultra-wideband Sensors,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, In Press.
- A. H. J. Immink, et al., “Signal processing and coding for two-dimensional optical storage,” Proceeding. IEEE Intl. Conf. Global Telecommun. (GLOBECOM), San Francisco, December 2003, pp. 3904-3908.
- M. E. Austin, “Decision-feedback Equalization for Digital Communication over Dispersive Channels,” Tech. Rep. 437, MIT Lincoln Lab, Lexington, MA, Aug. 1967.
- C. A. Belfiore and J. H. Park, “Decision Feedback Equalization,” Proceeding IEEE, Vol. 67, No. 8, 1979, pp. 1143-1156. doi:10.1109/PROC.1979.11409
- J. W. M. Bergmans, “Digital Baseband Transmission and Recording,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1996.
- K. Abend and B. D. Fritchman, “Statistical Detection for Communication Channels with Intersymbol Interference,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 58, No. 5, 1970, pp. 779-785. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1970.7732
- J. Moon and L. R. Carley, “Performance Comparison of Detection Methods in Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Trans. Magazine, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1990, pp. 3155-3172. doi: 10.1109/20.102903
- J. G. Kenney, L. R. Carley and R. W. Wood, “Multi-level Decision Feedback Equalization for Saturation Recording,” IEEE Trans. Magazine, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1993, pp. 2160-2171. doi:10.1109/20.221040
- G. Mathew, B. F. Boroujeny and R. W. Wood, “Design of Multilevel Decision Feedback Equalizers,” IEEE Trans. Magazine,” Vol. 33, No. 6, 1997, pp. 4528-4542. doi: 10.1109/20.649891
- V. M. Eyuboglu and S. U. H. Qureshi, “Reduced-state Sequence Estimation with Set Partitioning and Decision Feedback,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-36, No. 1, 1988, pp. 13-20. doi:10.1109/26.2724
- A. D. Hallen and C. Heegard, “Delayed decision-feedback sequence estimation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-37, No. 5, 1989, pp. 428-436. doi: 10.1109/26.24594
- J. F. Heanue, K. Gurkan and L. Hesselink, “Decision Feedback Viterbi Detector for Page-Access Optical Memories,” U. S. Patent 5740184, April 14, 1998.