An Evaluation on Publicness of Urban Public Spaces by Using Core Dimensions; Specific Reference to Galle Fort (Sea Bath Area), Forest (Beach) Park Area, Mahamodara Marine Walk and Ocean Pathway in Galle
- 1 Department of Town & Country Planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
- 2 Department of Town & Country Planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
Abstract
This paper aims to evaluate the publicness level in publicly owned and managed urban public spaces. For fulfillment of its main objective, this paper firstly examines deeply in existence publicness literatures. In the second part, with aim of finding appropriate model through previous models, and represents a democratic evaluation through a multi-criteria decision-making model. It aims to effectively evaluate and compare the publicness level of public spaces. The selected model assesses the publicness level by using ownership, management, access and user/s dimensions by analyzing the leading dissertations. Evaluating by people has a definite benefit due to good experience and better knowledge of societies about their living environment. The third part draws the research methodology and the final part examines the findings of the case study in Galle and suggests ways for further development and research.
- Akkar Ercan, M., & Memlük, N. (2015). More Inclusive than before? The Tale of a Historic Urban Park in Ankara, Turkey. URBAN DESIGN International, 20, 195-221. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.5
- Büyüközkan, G., & Görener, A. (2015). Evaluation of Product Development Partners Using an Integrated AHP-VIKOR Model. Kybernetes [Cybernetes], 44, 220-237. (In Czech) https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2014-0019
- Ekdi, F. P., & Çıracı, H. (2015). Really Public? Evaluating the Publicness of Public Spaces in Istanbul by Means of Fuzzy Logic Modelling. Journal of Urban Design, 20, 658-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1106919
- ER, V. (2019). Investigating the Morphological Aspects of Public Spaces: The Case of Atakum Coastal Promenade in Samsun. Urban Design in City and Regional Planning, 1-257.
- Huang, J., Tzeng, G., & Liu, H. (2009). A Revised VIKOR Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making—The Perspective of Regret Theory. In Y. Shi, S. Wang, Y. Peng, J. Li, & Y. Zeng (Eds), Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. MCDM 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 35. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02298-2_112
- Georgiana, V., & Damiano, C. (2013). Making the Publicness of Public Spaces Visible: from Space Syntax to the Star Model of Public Space. Visualizing Sustainability: Making the Invisible Visible (pp. 1-16). EAEA-11 Conference.
- Kelleci, S. (2012). Investigating the Publicness of Administrative Spaces and a Case Study in Bakanliklar [Ministries] District: Ankara. Middle East Technical University, 1-162. (In Turkish)
- Langstraat, F., & Melik, R. V. (2013). Challenging the ‘End of Public Space’: A Comparative Analysis of Publicness in British and Dutch Urban Spaces. Journal of Urban Design, 18, 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.800451
- Memlük, N. O. (2012). Inclusivity of Public Space: Changing Inclusivity of an Urban Park, Gençlik Parki [Youth Park], Ankara. Middle East Technical University, 1-189. (In Turkish)
- Pourjafar, M. R., Zangir, M. S., Moghadam, S. M., & Farhani, R. (2018). Is There Any Room for Public? Democratic Evaluation of Publicness of Public Places. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2018.v12n1.026039
- Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the Publicness of Public Space: The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15, 575-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350