This paper aims to answer the question of whether public service rests on single discipline, specialized ability or multidisciplinary talent. The method used is exploratory by illustration with case examples, some governmentally related, others nongovernmental yet service related. Case series are hypothesis generating, in this instance , identifying the nature of abilities that sustain public service. I support the inferential process with Horvath’s tripartite approach [space (e.g., service locale), time (taking into account project evolution), and person (as the center of multiple service projects) models], which raises a number of sub-driving questions. The sequence followed is to first consider whether public service can be either paid or voluntary, then examine whether public service projects are static and delimited or dynamic and evolving, in what way the comprehensiveness of the service demanded varies with one’s position with respect to leadership, and whether compounding levels of responsibility entail the evolution of public service involvement for the individual. The examples used, including the author’s experience with public health genetic policymaking in the public domain, suggest a flexible notion of public service that is connected with government but need not be or can be indirectly associated. Public service projects and involvement in public service are dynamic when granted the opportunity and at a high level of undertaking show convergence of project efforts. While public service may start out depending on individuals exhibiting single, specialized abilities, multidisciplinary talent is required as projects progress and link together.
APHA American Public Health Association (2022). About APHA. https://apha.org/About-APHA
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bielik, T., Damelin, D., & Krajcik, J. S. (2018). Why Do Fishermen Need Forests? Developing a Project-Based Learning Unit with an Engaging Driving Question. Science Scope, 41, 64-72. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss18_041_06_64
Bonham, V. L., Citrin, T., Modell, S. M., Franklin, T. H., Bleicher, E. W. B., & Fleck, L. M. (2009). Community-Based Dialogue: Engaging Communities of Color in the United States' Genetics Policy Conversation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34, 325-359. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-009
Brilliant, L. (2016). Sometimes Brilliant. HarperOne.
Campbell, M. K., Hudson, M. A., Resnicow, K., Blakeney, N., Paxton, A., & Baskin, M. (2007). Church-Based Health Promotion Interventions: Evidence and Lessons Learned. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Health Research, Services, Education and Policy: 1. Definitions, Objectives, and Evidence of Effectiveness. Clinical Investigations in Medicine, 29, 351-364.
Difference Between (2022). Difference between Community Service and Public Service. http://www.differencebetween.info/difference-between-community-service-and-public-service
Dodds, A., & Paskins, D. (2011). Top-Down or Bottom-Up: The Real Choice for Public Services? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982711X559154
Dror, Y. (1983). Public Policy Making Reexamined. Routledge.
Duquette, D., Langbo, C., Bach, J., & Kleyn, M. (2012). Michigan BioTrust for Health: Public Support for Using Residual Dried Blood Spot Samples for Health Research. Public Health Genomics, 15, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336565
Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics through Public Deliberation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820291.001.0001
Gaber, J. (2019). Building “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”: Sherry Arnstein, Citizen Participation, and Model Cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85, 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1612267
Garland, M. J. (1999). Experts and the Public: A Needed Partnership for Genetic Policy. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/3/308
Garland, M. J., & Hasnain, R. (1990). Community Responsibility and the Development of Oregon’s Health Care Priorities. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 9, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej199093/433
Hafner, K. (2006). Philanthropy Google’s Way: Not the Usual. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/14/technology/14google.html
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press.
Herman, M. L. (2022). Employee or Volunteer: What’s the Difference? https://nonprofitrisk.org/resources/articles/employee-or-volunteer-whats-the-difference
Hopkins, D. (2010). Planning a City through “Dialogue”: Deliberative Policy-Making in Action in Western Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 28, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2010.490619
Horvath, T. (1980). The Structure of Scientific Discovery and Man’s Ultimate Reality and Meaning. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 3, 144-163. https://doi.org/10.3138/uram.3.2.144
Ibrahim, M. A. (1985). Epidemiology and Health Policy. Aspen Systems Corporation.
Keady, C. (2015). This Foundation Has Provided Eyesight to 4 Million People in Developing Countries. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/seva-foundation-world-sight-day_n_56166cbee4b0082030a13cf1
Krettek, T. (2012). Education and Work as Seen through Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 35, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.3138/uram.35.1-2.32
Lee, S. (2022). Senate Moves Ahead on Uhlmann Vote for EPA Enforcement Chief. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/senate-moves-ahead-on-vote-for-uhlmann-as-epa-enforcement-chief
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2022). Public Service. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/public%20service
Modell, S. M. (1997). Genome Technology & Reproduction: Values & Public Policy. Policy Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-40). University of Michigan.
Modell, S. M. (2007). Genetic and Reproductive Technologies in the Light of Religious Dialogue. Zygon Journal of Religion & Science, 42, 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2006.00813.x
Modell, S. M., King, S. B., & Platt, J. E. (2008). Parallel Tracks in Two Faith-Based Genetic Dialogue Groups in the State of Michigan: Public Health Convergences. In 136th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting and Exposition (p. 167). American Public Health Association. https://apha.confex.com/apha/136am/webprogram/Paper174404.html
Modell, S. M., Citrin, T., Burmeister, M., Kardia, S. L. R., Beil, A., Raisky, J., & Genetics and Faith Dialogue Group. (2019). When Genetics Meets Religion: What Scientists and Religious Leaders Can Learn from Each Other. Public Health Genomics, 22, 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504261
Modell, S. M., & Hartman, T. C. (1998). Genome Horizons: Public Deliberations and Policy Pathways. Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-96). University of Michigan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242425310_Genome_Horizons_Public_Deliberations_and_Policy_Pathways
Modell, S. M., Fleming, P. J., Lopez, W. D., & Goltz, H. H. (2021). Work in Progress: Immigrant Health Care from the Vantage of Cancer Testing and Screening. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 23, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-01129-9
Modell, S. M., Schlager, L., Allen, C. G., & Marcus, G. (2022). Medicaid Expansions: Probing Medicaid’s Filling of the Cancer Genetic Testing and Screening Space. Healthcare (Basel), 10, 1066. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/6/1066 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061066
O’Doherty, K. C., Hawkins, A. K., & Burgess, M. M. (2012). Involving Citizens in the Ethics of Biobank Research: Informing Institutional Policy through Structured Public Deliberation. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1604-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026
Platt, T., Platt, J., Thiel, D. B., Fisher, N., & Kardia, S. L. R. (2014). “Cool! And Creepy”: Engaging with College Student Stakeholders in Michigan’s Biobank. Journal of Community Genetics, 5, 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0190-4
SHEN Spiritual Heritage Education Network (2022). Outreach in the Community. https://spiritualeducation.org/work/activites
Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public Services Management and Co-Production in Multi-Level Governance Settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008
Stanford Deliberative Democracy Lab (2021). America in One Room Climate and Energy: Discussion Results from a National Deliberative Poll. https://cdd.stanford.edu/results
Stanford Haas Center for Public Service (2022). Pathways of Public Service and Civic Engagement/Our People. https://haas.stanford.edu
Strange, M., Nilsson, C., Zdravkovic, S., & Mangrio, E. (2020). The Precision Health and Everyday Democracy (PHED) Project: Protocol for a Transdisciplinary Collaboration on Health Equity and the Role of Health in Society. JMIR Research Protocols, 30, e17324. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2020/11/e17324 https://doi.org/10.2196/17324
Team Asana (2021). Top-Down Approach vs. Bottom-Up Approach: What’s the Difference? https://asana.com/resources/top-down-approach
Thiel, D. B., Platt, T., Platt, J., King, S. B., & Kardia, S. L. R. (2014). Community Perspectives on Public Health Biobanking: An Analysis of Community Meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health. Journal of Community Genetics, 5, 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0162-0
Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to Reason. Harvard University Press.