Facilitated Discussion Process for Workplace Grievances
- 1 South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
- 2 Qualitative Research Consultant, Sydney, Australia
- 3 South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
- 4 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- 5 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- 6 NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- 7 Faculty of Nursing, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Objective: To explore the role and implementation of the Facilitated Discussion process in workplace grievance management within a healthcare setting. Methods: This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with implementers, developers and participants involved in Facilitated Discussions which were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed for key themes using thematic analysis techniques. No limit was placed on the number of participants, which included staff working in human resource department as well as administrative and clinical staff who had engaged with the facilitated discussion process. Results: Participants mostly viewed the process as meritorious associated with restorative justice principles. However, implementation of the process in the healthcare facility faced barriers to wider adoption due to lack of certainty about the roles and processes, limited training, staff availability and perceived risk. Adoption of principles and skills across the organization were identified as necessary for effective implementation. The findings suggested that training for facilitators and promoting the benefits of Facilitated Discussions across all levels of the organization could improve implementation. Conclusions: The nature of the process of facilitated discussions for grievance management requires resources to promote awareness and trust in the process, skilled facilitators and defined procedures for use in large facilities.
- Acosta, D., & Karp, D. R. (2018). Restorative Justice as the Rx for Mistreatment in Academic Medicine: Applications to Consider for Learners, Faculty, and Staff. Academic Medicine, 93, 354-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002037
- Cutrona, C. (2014). Community Mediation in the United States. In J. M. Fritz (Ed.), Moving toward a Just Peace: The Mediation Continuum (pp. 69-89). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2885-1_5
- Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science. Implementation Science, 4, Article No. 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
- Hopkins, B. (2015). From Restorative Justice to Restorative Culture. Revista de Asistenta Sociala, 14, 19-34. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Belinda-Hopkins/publication/354630816_From_Restorative_Justice_to_Restorative_Culture/links/614345b0b5bdf5148e28209c/From-Restorative-Justice-to-Restorative-Culture.pdf
- Hutchinson, M. (2009). Restorative Approaches to Workplace Bullying: Educating Nurses towards Shared Responsibility. Contemporary Nurse, 32, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.32.1-2.147
- Kfouri, J., & Lee, P. E. (2019). Conflict among Colleagues: Health Care Providers Feel Undertrained and Unprepared to Manage Inevitable Workplace Conflict. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 41, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.03.132
- Leonard, L. J. (2022). Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts? Laws, 11, Article No. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010014
- Lewitter, F., Bourne, P. E., & Attwood, T. K. (2019). Ten Simple Rules for Avoiding and Resolving Conflicts with Your Colleagues. PLOS Computational Biology, 15, e1006708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006708
- Livne-Tarandach, R., Steckler, E., Leigh, J., & Wheeler-Smith, S. (2021). Cultivating Organizations as Healing Spaces: A Typology for Responding to Suffering and Advancing Social Justice. Humanistic Management Journal, 6, 373-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00112-2
- Martela, F. (2019). What Makes Self-Managing Organizations Novel? Comparing How Weberian Bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s Adhocracy, and Self-Organizing Solve Six Fundamental Problems of Organizing. Journal of Organization Design, 8, Article No. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0062-9