Evaluating the Impact of “Smart Water” on the Management and Technical Efficiency of Water Supply Utilities: Evidence from Investigation on Shandong Province in China — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Evaluating the Impact of “Smart Water” on the Management and Technical Efficiency of Water Supply Utilities: Evidence from Investigation on Shandong Province in China
The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
,
The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
,
The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
,
Shandong Province City Water Supply and Drainage Water Quality Monitoring Center, Jinan, China
1 The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
2 The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
3 The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou, China
4 Shandong Province City Water Supply and Drainage Water Quality Monitoring Center, Jinan, China
The healthy development of the water supply industry is directly correlated with the quality of urban development. Utilizing survey data from water supply utilities in Shandong Province between 2010 and 2016, this study employs KLH model to assess both management efficiency and technical efficiency. The findings reveal that: 1) Technical and management efficiencies for Shandong’s water supply utilities are 70.6% and 72%, respectively, resulting in a compound efficiency of 52.9%. 2) Implementing “Smart Water” infrastructure in Shandong Province enhances technical and management efficiencies by approximately 11.7% and 11.5%, respectively, leading to a centralized trend in these aspects for water supply utilities within the province. 3) The mediating effect of “Smart Water” infrastructure on technical outcomes primarily manifests through enterprise scale, while its influence on management outcomes mainly stems from optimizing high-tech talent structures. Consequently, this paper proposes policy recommendations and strengthening support in planning, standards, technology and talent.
Acemoglu, D. (1997). Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 445-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/2971723
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1988). Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 38, 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-x
Battese, G. E., Rao, D. S. P., & O’Donnell, C. J. (2004). A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating under Different Technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:prod.0000012454.06094.29
Benito, B., Faura, U., Guillamón, M. D., & Ríos, A. M. (2019). The Efficiency of Public Services in Small Municipalities: The Case of Drinking Water Supply. Cities, 93, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.016
Bosworth, D., & Stoneman, P. (1998). An Efficiency Study for the Water Industry, Final Report: A Report to National Economic Research Associates . National Economic Research Associates.
Cabrera, E. (2008). Benchmarking in the Water Industry: A Mature Practice? Water Utility Management International, 3, 5-7.
Camanho, A., Barbosa, F., & Henriques, A. (2022). A System‐Level Optimization Framework for Efficiency and Effectiveness Improvement of Wastewater Treatment Plants. International Transactions in Operational Research, 29, 3370-3399. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13129
Carvalho, P., & Marques, R. C. (2014). Computing Economies of Vertical Integration, Economies of Scope and Economies of Scale Using Partial Frontier Nonparametric Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.022
Cetrulo, T. B., Marques, R. C., & Malheiros, T. F. (2019). An Analytical Review of the Efficiency of Water and Sanitation Utilities in Developing Countries. Water Research, 161, 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.044
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Cuesta, R. A. (2000). A Production Model with Firm-Specific Temporal Variation in Technical Inefficiency: With Application to Spanish Dairy Farms. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017297831646
Daraio, C., Kerstens, K., Nepomuceno, T., & Sickles, R. C. (2020). Empirical Surveys of Frontier Applications: A Meta‐Review. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27, 709-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12649
De Witte, K., & Geys, B. (2011). Evaluating Efficient Public Good Provision: Theory and Evidence from a Generalised Conditional Efficiency Model for Public Libraries. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 319-327.
Du, M., Wang, B., Chen, Z., & Liao, L. (2023). Productivity Evaluation of Urban Water Supply Industry in China: A Metafrontier-Biennial Cost Malmquist Productivity Index Approach. Annals of Operations Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05294-6
Greene, W. (2005a). Reconsidering Heterogeneity in Panel Data Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Model. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 269-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.003
Greene, W. (2005b). Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 7-32.
Greene, W. (2005c). Reconsidering Heterogeneity in Panel Data Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Model. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 269-303.
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis . Pearson Education India.
Hossin, M. A., Alemzero, D., Wang, R., Kamruzzaman, M. M., & Mhlanga, M. N. (2023). Examining Artificial Intelligence and Energy Efficiency in the MENA Region: The Dual Approach of DEA and SFA. Energy Reports, 9, 4984-4994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.03.113
Jun-Yen, L. (2005). Comparing SFA and DEA Methods on Measuring Production Efficiency for Forest and Paper Companies. Forest Products Journal, 55, Article 51.
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). Production Frontiers, Panel Data, and Time-Varying Technical Inefficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90055-x
Kumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2012). Technical Efficiency in Competing Panel Data Models: A Study of Norwegian Grain Farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0303-1
Li, L. (2018). Private Sector Participation and Performance of County Water Utilities in China. China Economic Review, 52, 30-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.06.001
Lin, C. (2005). Service Quality and Prospects for Benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru Water Sector. Utilities Policy, 13, 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2005.04.002
Mansur, E. T., & Olmstead, S. M. (2012). The Value of Scarce Water: Measuring the Inefficiency of Municipal Regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 71, 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.11.003
O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios. Empirical Economics, 34, 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4
Orea, L., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2004). Efficiency Measurement Using a Latent Class Stochastic Frontier Model. Empirical Economics, 29, 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-003-0184-2
Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F. (1981). The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3
Saal, D. S., & Parker, D. (2001). Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 20, 61-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011162214995
Saal, D. S., Arocena, P., Maziotis, A., & Triebs, T. (2013). Scale and Scope Economies and the Efficient Vertical and Horizontal Configuration of the Water Industry: A Survey of the Literature. Review of Network Economics, 12, 93-129. https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2012-0004
Thanassoulis, E. (2000). DEA and Its Use in the Regulation of Water Companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 127, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00436-1
Tsionas, E. G., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Firm Heterogeneity, Persistent and Transient Technical Inefficiency: A Generalized True Random-Effects Model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29, 110-132.
Wang, H. J., & Schmidt, P. (2002). One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016565719882
Wen, Z., Chang, L., Hau, K. T., & Liu, H. (2004). Testing and Application of the Mediating Effects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36, Article 614.
Woodbury, K., & Dollery, B. (2004). Efficiency Measurement in Australian Local Government: The Case of New South Wales Municipal Water Services. Review of Policy Research, 21, 615-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00098.x
Worthington, A. C. (2014). A Review of Frontier Approaches to Efficiency and Productivity Measurement in Urban Water Utilities. Urban Water Journal, 11, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2013.765488