Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Markov Model for Human Resources Supply Forecast Dividing the HR System into Subgroups
Mohammadia School of Engineering Rabat, Studies and Research Laboratory in Applied Mathematics (LERMA), Mohammed V University, Agdal, Morocco.
Mohammadia School of Engineering Rabat, Studies and Research Laboratory in Applied Mathematics (LERMA), Mohammed V University, Agdal, Morocco.
- 1 Mohammadia School of Engineering Rabat, Studies and Research Laboratory in Applied Mathematics (LERMA), Mohammed V University, Agdal, Morocco.
- 2 Mohammadia School of Engineering Rabat, Studies and Research Laboratory in Applied Mathematics (LERMA), Mohammed V University, Agdal, Morocco.
Journal of Service Science and Management·Volume 06 (2013)·Pages 211–217·Published 6 August 2013·DOI10.4236/jssm.2013.63023
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Modeling the manpower management mainly concerns the prediction of future behavior of employees. The paper presents a predictive model of numbers of employees in a hierarchical dependent-time system of human resources, inc o rporating subsystems that each contains grades of the same family. The proposed model is motivated by the reality of staff development which confirms that the path evolution of each employee is usually in his family of grades. That is the reason of dividing the system into subgroups and the choice of the superdiagonal transition matrix.
KeywordsManpower PlanningForecastingMarkov Modeling
- [1] D. G. Collings and G. Wood, “Human Resource Management, a Critical Approach,” Routledge, London, 2009.
- D. Torrington, L. Hall and S. Taylor, “Human Resource Management,” 6th Edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow, 2005.
- A. Mehlmann, “An Approach to Optimal Recruitment and Transition Strategies for Manpower Systems Using Dynamic Programming,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 31, No. 11, 1980, pp. 1009-1015.
- R. Poornachandra, “A Dynamic Programming Approach to Determine Optimal Manpower Recruitment Policies,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 41, No. 10, 1990, pp. 983-988.
- D. J. Bartholomew, “Stochastic Models for Social Processes,” 3rd Edition, Wiley, Chichester, 1982.
- P. C. G. Vassiliou, “Asymptotic Behavior of Markov Systems,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1982, pp. 851-857. doi:10.2307/3213839
- P. C. G. Vassiliou and A. C. Georgiou, “Asymptotically Attainable Structures in Non-Homogeneous Markov Systems,” Operations Research, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1990, pp. 537-545. doi:10.1287/opre.38.3.537
- P. C. G. Vassiliou, A. C. Georgiou and N. Tsantas, “Control of Asymptotic Variability in Non-Homogeneous Markov Systems,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1990, pp. 756-766. doi:10.2307/3214820
- N. Tsantas and P. C. G. Vassiliou, “The Non-Homogeneous Markov System in a Stochastic Environment,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 30, 1993, pp. 285-301. doi:10.2307/3214839
- K. Nilakantan and B. G. Raghavendra, “Control Aspects In Proportionality Markov Manpower Systems,” Applied Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2004, pp. 85-116. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2004.04.003
- A. C. Georgiou and N. Tsantas, “Modeling Recruitment Training in Mathematical Human Resource Planning,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business And Industry, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2002, pp. 53-74. doi:10.1002/asmb.454
- V. A. Dimitriou and N. Tsantas, “Prospective Control in an Enhanced Manpower Planning Model,” Applied Mabthematics and Computation, Vol. 215, No. 3, 2009, pp. 995-1014.
- T. De Feyter, “Modeling Heterogeneity in Manpower Planning: Dividing the Personnel System into More Homogeneous Subgroups,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2006, pp. 321-334. doi:10.1002/asmb.619
- N. Tsantas, “Stochastic Analysis of a Non-Homogeneous Markov System,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1995, pp. 670-685. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0365-5