During the constant research of internationalization, firms have been focused on as it is the main body that implements strategies. However, the role of a country in the process of internationalization has been ignored for a long time. Where does country-specific advantage come from? What’s the relationship between country-specific advantage and firm-specific advantage? These questions haven’t been understood clearly yet. Home country provides necessary infrastructure, service conditions, resources and institutions guarantee, which is the origin of firm’s core competition advantages; while host country’s characteristic will influence the way and path of internalization. It is of great significance to understand how to transform country-specific advantages into firm- specific advantages in the process of internationalization of multinational firms.
Rugman, A.M. (1981) Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. Columbia University Press, New York.
Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, V. (2001) Subsidiary-Specific Advantages in Multinational Enterprise. 22, 237-250.
Zhang, H., Xu, J.F. and Jiang, Q.H. (2006) A Study on the Formation and Development of Subsidiary Special Advantage: A Perspective of Resources. Journal of International Trade, 4, 102-106
Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2008) Institutions and the OLI Paradigm of the Multinational Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 573-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9074-z
Song, Z.N. and Hu, J.B. (2012) FSAs, CSAs, and the Internationalization of Large-scale Firms: A Case of Southwest Ethnic Area. Guangxi Ethnic Studies, No. 3, 167-173.
Havawini, G., Subramanian, V. and Verdin, P. (2004) The Home Country in the Age of Globalization: How Much Does It Matter for Firm Performance. Journal of World Business, No. 3, 99-112.
Wan, W.P. (2005) Country Resource Environments, Firm Capabilities, and Corporate Diversification Strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 161-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00492.x
Pei, C.H., Zhao, X.Z. and Peng, L. (2007) Economic Globalization and Contemporary International Trade. Social Sciences Academic Press, London.
Zhang, J.F. (2014) Discussion on China’s Foreign Direct Investment Dynamic Mechanism. Modern Economic Research, No. 11, 58-62.
Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J. and Lien, Y.-C. (2007) FDI by Firms from Newly Industrialised Economies in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance, Entry Mode and Location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 556-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400279
Xiao, W. and Zhou, J.Z. (2014) Chinese OFDI Location Preferences with Country-Specific Advantages: An Empirical Analysis Based on Firms’ Investment Motivation and Capability. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 44, 184-196.
Erramilli, K.M., Agarwal, S. and Kim, S.-S. (1997) Are Firm-Specific Advantage Location-Specific Too? Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 735-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490117
Dunning, J.H. (1981) Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Development Approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 177, 30-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02696577
Shan, W.J. and Hamilton, W. (1991) Country-Specific Advantage and International Cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 419-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120603
Hymer, S. (1960) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Wells Jr., L.T. (1983) Third World Multinationals: The Rise of Foreign Investment of U.S. Advertising Agencies. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New York.
Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage on Nations. Free Press, New York.
Chen, W.P. (2002) Competitive Advantage Theory: Inspiration for China’s Development of Int’l Service Trade. International Economics and Trade Research, 2, 2-4.
Rugman, A.M. and D’Cruz, J.R. (1993) The Double Diamond Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience. Management International Review, 33, 17-39.
Kim, M.Y. (2006) Inequality in Globalization: An Extension of the Gini Index from the Perspective of National Competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy, 7, 119-140.
Moon, H.C., Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1995) The Generalized Double Diamond Approach to International Competitiveness. Research in Global Strategic Management: Beyond the Diamond, 6, 97-114.
Moon, H.C., Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1998) A Generalized Double Diamond Approach to the Global Competitiveness of Korea and Singapore. International Business Review, 7, 135-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(98)00002-X
Cho, D.S. (1994) A Dynamic Approach to International Competitiveness: The Case of Korea. Journal of Far Eastern Business, 1, 17-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602389400000002
Cho, D.S. and Moon, H.C. (2000) From Adam Smith to Michael Porter. World Scientific, Singapore.
Dunning, J.H. (2000) The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity. International Business Review, 9, 163-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00035-9
Rugman, A. (2010) Reconciling Internalization Theory and the Eclectic Paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1525383X201000007
Chai, Z.D. and Liu, H.J. (2014) An Analysis of the Home Factors in Competitive Advantages of the Emerging Market’s MNEs. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 24-31.
Pei, C. and Zheng, W. (2011) Country-Specific Advantages: Supplementary Explanation of International Investment Theory. Economic Research Journal, No. 11, 21-35.
Song, Z.N. and Yin, Z.M. (2013) The Transfer from Country-Specific Advantages to Firm-Specific Advantages: Logic Paths and Realistic Barriers. International Economics and Trade Research, No. 6, 25-35.
Chen, R.J. (2011) World Economics Pattern Change and China Export-Orient Economy Reforming. International Business Research, No. 4, 3-8.
Dunning, J.H. (1995) Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 461-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490183
Pauly, L.W. and Reich, S. (1997) National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behaviour: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalization. International Organization, 51, 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081897550285
Nachum, L. and Rolle, J.D. (1999) Home Country and Firm-Specific Ownership Advantages: A Study of US, UK and French Advertising Agencies. International Business Review, 8, 633-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00023-2
Nachum, L. and Rolle, J.D. (1999) The National Origin of the Ownership Advantages of Firms: A Case Study of the Advertising Industry. The Service Industries Journal, 19, 17-48.
Nachum, L. (1999) The Origins of the International Competitiveness of Firms: The Impact of Location and Ownership in Professional Service Industries. Edward Elgar, Aldershot and Brookfield.
Schroath, F.W., Hu, M.Y. and Chen, H. (1993) Country-of-Origin Effects of Foreign Investments in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 277-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490233
Shane, S. (1994) The Effect of National Culture on the Choice between Licensing and Direct Foreign Investment. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 627-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150805
Yip, S.G., Johansson, K.J. and Roos, J. (1997) Effects of Nationality on Global Strategy. Management International Review, 37, 365-385.
Zaheer, S. and Zaheer, A. (1997) Country Effects on Information Seeking in Global Electronic Networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 77-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490094
Cong, J. and Zhang, H. (2014) Study on the Motivation of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment—Based on the Characteristics of Host Countries. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, No. 4, 104-113.
Scott, W.R. (2006) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Gubbi, S.R., Aulakh, P.S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M.B. and Chittoor, R. (2010) Do International Acquisitions by Emerging-Economy Firms Create Shareholder Value? The Case of Indian Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 397-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.47
Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L.G. (1983) Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392383
Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Performance.
Beamish, P.W. (1985) The Characteristics of Joint Ventures in Developed and Developing Countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20, 13-19.
Cho, D.S., Moon, H.C. and Kim, M.Y. (2009) Does One Size Fit All? A Dual Double Diamond Approach to Country-Specific Advantages. Asian Business & Management, 8, 83-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/abm.2008.27
Lall, S. and Siddharthan, N.S. (1982) The Monopolistic Advantages of Multinationals: Lessons from Foreign Investment in the U.S. Economic Journal, 92, 668-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232556
Buckley, P.J. (1990) Problems and Developments in the Core Theory of International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 657-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490346
Itaki, M. (1991) A Critical Assessment of the Eclectic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 445-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490310
Cantwell, J. (1989) British Multinationals: Origins, Management and Performance. Economic History Review, 42, 144-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2597067
Cantwell, J. (1992) The Methodological Problems Raised by the Collection of Foreign Direct Investment Data. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1, 86-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0962-9262(92)90038-8
Chai, Z.D. (2007) Competitive Advantages of the Emerging Market’s MNEs: Firm-Specific or Home Factors? Asia- Pacific Economic Review, No. 3, 25-28.