Governmental Spending on Public Cultural Services: Efficiency and Influencing Factors Analysis Based on DEA-Tobit
- 1 Guangdong Research Center for NPO, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
- 2 School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
- 3 School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Based on the panel data of provinces in China from 2000 to 2015, this article explores the efficiency of local government spending on public cultural services and its influencing factors under the DEA-Tobit two-stage analysis framework. First, the comprehensive efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale technical efficiency of local government public cultural expenditure were measured through the data envelopment analysis method (DEA). On the basis of the first step analysis, we use Tobit model with the limited dependent variable to study the relationship between the efficiency evaluation results and policy variable such as fiscal decentralization, cultural policy, the relationship between the efficiency evaluation results and social factors like per capita GDP, population density and residents’ educational level etc. Through the analysis of the evaluation results, it is found that there were significant differences in the local efficiency on public cultural expenditure in China. The effects of population density, urbanization level, per capita GDP and illiteracy rate on the efficiency of government public cultural expenditure are positive. After controlling population, economic and social factors, the effect of fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of public cultural expenditure is negative, and cultural policy has significantly promoted the efficiency of Chinese local government cultural expenditure.
- Han, M. (2009) On the Financial Support for the Construction of Public Cultural Service System Research. Administrative Assets and Finance, 43-45.
- He, G.Q. (2009) Adjusting and Perfecting the Guarantee Mechanism of Rural Compulsory Education Funds. China Finance, 22, 39-40.
- Wei, P.J. (2005) Cultural Undertakings of the Financial Support. Contemporary Finance, 3, 43-48.
- Ma, H.T. and Cheng, L. (2009) Perfecting Fiscal Policy to Promote the Construction of Public Cultural Service System. China Finance, 23, 41-43.
- Jiang, G.H. (2011) Public Cultural Services Financial Investment Mechanism. China Administration, 1, 32-36.
- Netzer, D. (1992) Differences in Reliance on User Charges by American State and Local Governments. Public Finance Quarterly, 20, 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219202000407
- Lin, W.L. (2005) Economic Development Level under the Constraints of Urban and Rural Public Goods Supply: Theoretical Analysis and Its Real Meaning. China Rural Observations, 2, 31-37.
- Zhang, N. and Lu, W.C. (2006) Empirical Analysis on the Impact of Rural Labor Force Quality on Agricultural Efficiency in China. Agricultural Technology & Economy, 2, 74-80.
- Grossman, P.J., Mavros, P. and Wassmer, R.W. (1999) Public Sector Technical Inefficiency in Large US Cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 278-299.
- Athanassopoulos, A.D. (2003) Strategic Groups, Frontier Benchmarking and Performance Differences: Evidence from the UK Retail Grocery Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 921-953. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6486.00365/full
- Milligan, K., Moretti, E. and Oreopoulos, P. (2004) Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of public Economics, 88, 1667-1695.
- Han, H.W. and Miao, Y.Q. (2010) An Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Local Government Health Expenditure. Journal of Finance and Economics, 5, 1-13.