An Empirical Analysis of Communication on Trust Building in Virtual Teams
- 1 Graduate School of Innovation Management, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- 2 Department of Social and Human Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the communication on trust building in virtual teams. Ten teams consisting of three workers (an editor, a designer, and a coder) were asked to create a sample web page in one week. All workers were in remote environment and a text-only communication tool was provided to all teams. In addition, five teams could use a non-text communication tool through which one can see other member’s situation with a web camera image and a short text message. All communication logs were collected and classified into three types: formal communication, informal communication, and awareness communication. All participated workers answered the questionnaire about trust before and after the task was completed. The analysis results based on the questionnaire and communication log data are discussed at the end. The result shows the use of non-text communication tool did not affect trust building; however, amount of awareness communication affected trust building. Log-in to the communication system at the same time also affected trust building. The findings of this study showed the tendency of awareness communication helping team building trust in the remote environment.
- Swart, G. (2012) Knowledge Stream, Retrieved August 18, 2016.
- Karlgaard, R. (2014) The Soft Edge: Where Great Companies Find Lasting Success. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
- Wizard, R.C. (2010) The Challenges of Working in Virtual Teams. Virtual Team Survey Report, USA.
- Jarvenpaa, S. and Leidner, D. (1999) Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
- Simmel, G. and Wolff, K.H. (1950) The Sociology of Georgsimmel. Vol. 92892, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
- Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Linpack, J. and Stamps, J. (1997) Virtual Teams: Reaching across Space, Time and Organization with Technology. John Wiley, New York, NY.
- Duncan, T. and Moriarty, S. (1998) A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252157
- Fay, M.J. (2011) Informal Communication of Co-Workers: A Thematic Analysis of Messages. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 6, 212-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641111188394
- Ishii, H. and Brygg, U. (1997) Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, 22-27 March 1997, 234-241.
- Jang, C. (2009) Facilitating Trust in Virtual Teams: The Role of Awareness. Competition Forum. Vol. 7, No. 2, American Society for Competitiveness, 399-407.
- Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. (1992) Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, 107-114.
- Akerlof, G.A. (1970) The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
- Luhmann, N. (2000) Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 6, 94-107.
- Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (1985) The Strategies for Taking Charge. Harper. Row, Leaders, New York.
- Yamagishi, T. and Yamagishi, M. (1994) Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397