Purpose: The work analyzes the concept of emergence according to ecosystems view. Therefore, the study proposes an integrated framework based on the combination of Viable Systems Approach (VSA) and Service-Dominant logic (S-D logic). The concept of service ecosystems and the identification of their main elements allows at pinpointing the main drivers for value co-creation and innovation that can lead to co-evolution as the key driver to challenge complexity. However, co-evolution is an unintelligible construct that can be observed only in the ongoing processes of value co-creation emergence. Methodology/Approach: Starting from the identification of the common points and of the dissimilarities between S-D logic and VSA, a matching between viable systems and service ecosystems is proposed to reveal the key drivers leading to the emergence of viable value co-creation. Then, the main elements of viable systems and ecosystems are integrated and subdivided into three drivers (value propositions, resource integration, institutions) for viable value co-creation and co-evolution in (eco)systems organizations. Findings: The integration between viable systems and ecosystems permits to reread emergence, intended as a key driver to challenge complexity in VSA, according to ecosystems perspective by leveraging on the notion of value co-creation as an ongoing process that can foster co-evolution over time. In this way, the concept of systems emergence can be reinterpreted in the light of value co-creation notion and based on a viable ecosystems view that can contribute to reveal the main drivers (resource integration, institutions and value propositions) and outcome (innovation and co-evolution) of value co-creation emergence. Implications: From a theoretical point of view, the study enhances a better understanding of emergence by associating the construct (relatively unexplored in literature) with value co-creation by shedding light on the mechanisms underlying service interactions. Regarding managerial stand-point, revealing the drivers to detect the emergence of viable value co-creation can aid managers to elaborate strategies for managing the unexpected and optimizing relationships among actors in order to challenge complexity. Originality/Value: By reinterpreting the concept of emergence according to ecosystems perspective, the work proposes an innovative application of the process of systems emergence to value co-creation mechanisms and rereads innovation as co-evolution, intended as a dynamic output of emergence. The viable ecosystems view on emergence and the identification of its drivers can advance a research agenda for further research aimed at analyzing: 1) the main strategies to challenge complexity; 2) the antecedents and drivers of co-creation; 3) the relationship between value co-creation and innovation.
KeywordsEmergence
Chesbrough, H. and Spohrer, J. (2006) A Research Manifesto for Services Science. Communications of the ACM, 49, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139945
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business Model Innovation: It’s Not Just about Technology Anymore. Strategy & Leadership, 35, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2010) From Repeat Patronage to Value Co-Creation in Service Ecosystems: A Transcending Conceptualization of Relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, 4, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0046-0
Gummesson, E. (2002) Relationship Marketing in the New Economy. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1, 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v01n01_04
Grönroos, C. (2008) Service Logic Revisited: Who Creates Value? And Who Co-Creates? European Business Review, 20, 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340810886585
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Vargo, S.L., Koskela-Huotari, K., Baron, S., Edvardsson, B., Reynoso, J. and Colurcio, M. (2017) A Systems Perspective on Markets—Toward a Research Agenda. Journal of Business Research, 79, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.011
Vargo, S.L., Wieland, H. and Akaka, M.A. (2015) Innovation through Institutionalization: A Service Ecosystems Perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008
Barile, S. and Polese, F. (2010) Linking the Viable System and Many-to-Many Network Approaches to Service-Dominant Logic and Service Science. International Journal of Quality and Service Science, 2, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691011026586
Barile, S. (2000) Contributi Sul Pensiero Sistemico in Economia d’Impresa. Centro Studi di Tecniche Aziendali, Arnia, WM Stampa Editoriale srl, Atripalda, Italy.
Golinelli, G.M. (2000) L’approccio Sistemico al Governo dell’Impresa. L’Impresa Sistema Vitale, Cedam, Padova
Viable Systems Approach
Service-Dominant Logic
Service Ecosystems
Value Co-Creation
Barile, S., Pels, J., Polese, F. and Saviano, M. (2012) An Introduction to the Viable Systems Approach and Its Contribution to Marketing. Journal of Business Marketing and Management, 2, 54-78.
Pels, J., Polese, F. and Brodie, R.J. (2012) Value Co-Creation: Using a Viable Systems Approach to Draw Implications from Organizational Theories. Mercati e Competitività, 1, 19-38.
Storbacka, K., Brodie, R.J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P.P. and Nenonen, S. (2016) Actor Engagement as a Microfoundation for Value Co-Creation. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3008-3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034
Lusch, R.F. and Nambisan, S. (2015) Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39, 155-175. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
Saarijärvi, H., Kannan, P.K. and Kuusela, H. (2013) Value Co-Creation: Theoretical Approaches and Practical Implications. European Business Review, 25, 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341311287718
Grönroos, C. and Voima, P. (2013) Critical Service Logic: Making Sense of Value Creation and Co-Creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3
Barile, S. and Saviano, M. (2011) Foundations of Systems Thinking: The Structure-System Paradigm. In: Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach, International Printing, Avellino, 1-24.
Barile S. (2008) L’impresa come sistema. Contributi sull’Approccio Sistemico Vitale (ASV). Giappichelli, Torino.
Polese, F. and Di Nauta, P. (2013) A Viable Systems Approach to Relationship Management in S-D Logic and Service Science. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 73, 113-129.
Golinelli, G.M. and Gatti, M. (2001) The Firm as a Viable System. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, No. 2, 38-63. https://doi.org/10.4468/2001.2.04golinelli.gatti
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General System Theory. George Braziller, New York.
Golinelli, G.M., Gatti, M. and Vagnani, G. (2002) Dalla struttura al sistema: Elementi per una riflessione sui confini, i rapporti con la proprietà, la flessibilità e l’elasticità dell’impresa. In: Golinelli, G.M., Ed., L’approccio sistemico al governo dell’impresa, Vol. 3, Cedam, Padova.
Barile, S. and Polese, F. (2010) Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science. Service Science, 2, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.21
Peters, L. (2014) Emergent vs. Summative Resource Integration and Value Co-Creation in Service-Ecosystems. UBS Research Paper Series No. 2014-07.
Peters, L.D. (2016) Heteropathic versus Homopathic Resource Integration and Value Co-Creation in Service Ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2999-3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.033
Vargo, S.L., Wieland, H. and Akaka, M.A. (2016) Innovation in Service Ecosystems. Journal of Serviceology, 1, 1-5.
Grönroos, C. (2000) Relationship Marketing: The Nordic School Perspective. In: Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A., Eds., Handbook of Relationship Marketing, Vol. 1, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 95-117. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231310.n4
Gummesson, E. (2004) Return on Relationships (ROR): The Value of Relationship Marketing and CRM in Business-to-Business Contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19, 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620410524016
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2002) The Co-Creation Connection. Strategy and Business, 27, 50-61.
Gummesson, E. (1994) Broadening and Specifying Relationship Marketing. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 2, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1320-1646(94)70276-8
Vargo, S.L. and Akaka, M.A. (2012) Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re) Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. Service Science, 4, 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1120.0019
Maglio, P.P. and Spohrer, J. (2008) Fundamentals of Service Science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0058-9
Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P. and Akaka, M.A. (2008) On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003
Chandler, J.D. and Vargo, S.L. (2011) Contextualization and Value-in-Context: How Context Frames Exchange. Marketing Theory, 11, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593110393713
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2011) Reducing the Fear of Crime in a Community: A Logic of Systems & System of Logics Perspective. Proceedings of the Grand Challenge in Service Week: Understanding Complex Service Systems through Different Lens, Cambridge, 2011, 1-25.
Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2013) The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing. Journal of International Marketing, 21, 1-20.
Barile, S., Lusch, R., Reynoso, J., Saviano, M. and Spohrer, J. (2016) Systems, Networks, and Ecosystems in Service Research. Journal of Service Management, 27, 652-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-09-2015-0268
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. and Song, M. (2017) Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly, 41, 223-238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L. and Gustafsson, A. (2016) Fostering a Trans-Disciplinary Perspectives of Service Ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2957-2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.028