Research on Competitiveness Evaluation Index System of Cultural Tourism Enterprises in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
- 1 Shenzhen Tourism College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
- 2 Shenzhen Tourism College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
- 3 Shenzhen Tourism College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
Abstract
As the most free-spirited and open economic zone in China, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is constructed towards the destination as a quality living circle for living, working and travelling. The integration of culture and tourism is a new business format derived from the construction, which also supports the system architecture of cultured bay area. This paper selects the practitioners of the business format as the research subject, and constructs the competitiveness evaluation index system of cultural tourism enterprises in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area through Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process from five dimensions of resource endowment, financial operation, cultural creativity and technology, regional environment and potential development, taking Guangzhou Lingnan Group, Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town and China Travel HK as the empirical test objects. According to the test results and analysis, the research proposes the path for enhancing competitiveness of cultural tourism enterprises under the new circumstances and discusses the future development.
- The Fourth Session of the 12th National People’s Congress. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China.
- The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.
- Xu, C. and Ye, L. (2008) An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison of Dynamic Competitiveness of China’s Tourism Listed Companies. Tourism Tribune, 23, 28-32.
- Gao, L. and Zhang, W. (2008) Comprehensive Evaluation System of the Competitiveness of Tourism Listed Companies. Science and Technology Economic Market, No. 9, 9-11.
- Ge, H. (2008) Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Tourism Enterprises. Accounting and Finance, No. 5, 91-94.
- Xie, Y., Xiao, G. and Fu, J. (2010) ANP-Based Evaluation Model of Tourism Enterprise Competitiveness. The 5th Chinese Academy of Management Annual Meeting Entrepreneurship and SME Management Parallel Session, Dalian, 13 November 2010, 39-48.
- Li, J., Zhang, H. and Zhang, C. (2011) Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Tourism Listed Companies Based on Entropy Weight Grey Correlation. Travel Forum, 4, 49-54.
- Zhang, G. and Liang, Q. (2011) Analysis of the Competitiveness of Tourism Enterprises in Shandong Province. Shandong Economy, No. 4, 129-133.
- Yu, Y. and Luo, L. (2014) Empirical Analysis of the Competitiveness of Online Tourism Enterprises Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method. Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics, No. 4, 78-86.
- Porter, M.E. (1997) The Competitive Advantage. Chen Xiaoyue Translated, Huaxia Publishing House, Beijing.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
- Barney, J. (1991) Film Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
- Collis, D.J. and Montgomery, C.A. (1995) Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73, 118-128.
- Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79-91.
- Chandler, G.N. and Hanks, S.H. (1994) Founder Competence, the Environment, and Venture Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800306