Systems Approach to Develop a Conceptual Model of the Service Enterprise
- 1 Department of Biomedical Systems Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, México
- 2 Department of Systems, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, México
- 3 Department of Systems, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, México
Abstract
Considering the characteristics and particularities of services such as inseparability, perishability and variability, which make them ephemeral and little tangible, non-storable, and non-patentable, we can have a clear idea of the complexity that exists in planning, operating and solving problems in service companies. This situation demands the use of a different vision to analyze and study these companies and their problems. Therefore, the systems approach is presented and used for the construction of a conceptual model, as a support framework to situate and organize our perceptions, fix the structure of the problem, delimit the area of interest and define the relevant and non-relevant aspects. With the systems vision, we have been able to use the three basic forms of planning for decision making (strategic, tactical and operative) in the construction of a conceptual model. The methodology used that integrates these three basic forms of planning is presented in a logical-formal guide for the construction of the conceptual model of the service company. This representation identifies the basic elements of a business model such as customers, value proposition, infrastructure and information for decision making, as well as their interactions. The model obtained is simple, relevant, and easy to understand and at the same time does not oversimplify the complex operation of a service company.
- Maglio, P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J. and Spohrer, J. (2006) Service Systems, Service Scientists, SSME, and Innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49, 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139955
- Hartman, D. and Lindgren, J. (1993) Consumer Evaluations of Goods and Services: Implications for Services Marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 7, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049310038364
- Barile, S. and Polese, F. (2010) Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science. Service Science, 2, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.21
- Barile, S., Spohrer, J. and Polese, F. (2010) Editorial Column—System Thinking for Service Research Advances. Service Science, 2, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.i
- White, S.A. (2004) Introduction to BPMN. BPTrends.
- Flood, R. and Zambuni, S.A. (1990) Viable Systems Diagnosis. 1. Application with a Major Tourism Services Group. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 3, 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062730
- Beer, S. (1984) The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2
- Godsiff, P. (2010) Service Systems and Requisite Variety. Service Science, 2, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.92
- Ashby, R. (1964) An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London.
- Ashby, R. (1969) Self-Regulation and Requisite Variety. Penguin, Baltimore, 105-124.
- Forrester, J. (1958) Industrial Dynamics. A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers. Harvard Business Review, 36, 37-66.
- Böttcher, M. and Fähnrich, K.-P. (2011) Service Systems Modeling: Concepts, Formalized Meta-Model and Technical Concretion. In: The Science of Service Systems, Springer, Berlin, 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8270-4_8
- Budinsky, F., Steinberg, D., Ellersick, R., Grose, T. and Merks, E. (2004) Eclipse Modeling Framework: A Developer’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston.
- Golnam, A., Regev, G. and Wegmann, A. (2011) A Modeling Framework for Analyzing the Viability of Service Systems. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 2, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.4018/jssmet.2011070104