How to Mitigate the Harm of Abusive Supervision to Employee’s Innovative Behaviors: The Role of Employee’s Proactive Personality and Supervisor’s Performance Goal Orientation — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
How to Mitigate the Harm of Abusive Supervision to Employee’s Innovative Behaviors: The Role of Employee’s Proactive Personality and Supervisor’s Performance Goal Orientation
School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
1 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
The survival and development of enterprises are increasingly dependent on individual innovative behavior. A large number of studies have shown that abusive supervision has a negligible negative impact on employee’s innovative behavior. This article examines the mitigation effect of employee’s proactive personality and supervisor’s performance gold orientation on the relationship between abusive supervision and employee’s innovative behavior. Through a paired study of 39 supervisors and 203 subordinates, a hierarchical linear model was used for analysis. The research results show that: when employees have a high proactive personality, regardless of the level of supervisor’s abusive supervision, employee’s innovation behavior is not affected; and when employee’s proactive personality is low, the supervisor’s high-performance gold orientation can mitigate the harm of abusive supervision to employee’s innovative behavior.
Bruce, S.R.A. (1994) Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Tepper, B.J. (2000) Consequences of Abusive Supervision. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Rafferty, A.E. and Restubog, S.L.D. (2011) The Influence of Abusive Supervisors on Followers. Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: The Hidden Costs of Abusive Supervision. British Journal of Management, 22, 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x
Zhang, H., Kwan, H.K., Zhang, X., et al. (2014) High Core Self-Evaluators Maintain Creativity: A Motivational Model of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Management, 40, 1151-1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460681
Liu, D., Liao, H. and Loi, R. (2012) The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187-1212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400
Rousseau, V. and Caroline, A. (2018) When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E. and Griffin, R.W. (1993) Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L. and Crant, J.M. (2006) What Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Linking Proactive Personality and Career Success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x
Gong, Y., Cheung, S.Y., Wang, M., et al. (2012) Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity: Integration of the Employee Proactivity, Information Exchange, and Psychological Safety Perspectives. Journal of Management, 36, 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380250
Vandewalle, D. (1997) Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
Nandkeolyar, A.K., Shaffer, J.A., Li, A., et al. (2014) Surviving an Abusive Supervisor: The Joint Roles of Conscientiousness and Coping Strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034262
Tepper, B.J., Moss, S.E. and Carr, L.J.C. (2007) Abusive Supervision, Upward Maintenance Communication, and Subordinates’ Psychological Distress. The Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159918
Hobfoll, S.E. (1989) Conservation of Resources. A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Amabile, T.M. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., et al. (1996) Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
Bateman, T.S. and Crant, J.M. (1999) Proactive Behavior: Meaning, Impact, Recommendations. Business Horizons, 42, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010) Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Dweck, C. and Leggett, E. (1988) A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B., et al. (2004) Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
Janssen, O. (2005) The Joint Impact of Perceived Influence and Supervisor Supportiveness on Employee Innovative Behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 78, 573-579. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25823
Seibert, S.E., Crant, J.M. and Kraimer, M.L. (1999) Proactive Personality and Career Success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
Baranik, L.E., Barron, K.E. and Finney, S.J. (2007) Measuring Goal Orientation in a Work Domain: Construct Validity Evidence for the 2 x 2 Framework. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 697-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292090
Bauer, D.J. and Curran, P.J. (2005) Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5
Curran, P.J., Bauer, D.J. and Willoughby, M.T. (2006) Testing and Probing Interactions in Hierarchical Linear Growth Models.
Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J. and Bauer, D.J. (2006) Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
King, N. (2011) Modelling the Innovation Process: An Empirical Comparison of Approaches. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 65, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00487.x
Tepper, B.J. and Henle, C.A. (2011) A Case for Recognizing Distinctions among Constructs That Capture Interpersonal Mistreatment in Work Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.688
Duffy, M.K., Shaw, J.D., Scott, K.L., et al. (2006) The Moderating Roles of Self-Esteem and Neuroticism in the Relationship between Group and Individual Undermining Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1066-1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1066