Transportation Users’ Attitudes and Choices of Ride-Hailing Services in Two Cities with Different Attributes
- 1 Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- 3 Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- 4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Abstract
The rapid technological developments in the 21 st century created new opportunities for shared-use economy applications around the globe. Among other services, Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) like Uber and Lyft emer ged in the US as a transportation alternative that offered a higher level of availability, reliability, and convenience than traditional modes. However, TNCs deployment was also blamed for increases in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in large cities that embraced TNC services early on. Concerns about TNC adoption are also magnified by the current controversy in policy and legislation as to the regulation of TNCs. These new realizations create a need to examine the transportation users’ attitudes and perceptions regarding ride-hailing service, after nearly a decade of service in the Unites States market. In doing so, this paper compares and contrasts results from two recently completed studies aiming at creating links between socio-demographic factors and TNC use. The paper describes the methods employed to collect the data and presents findings from the analysis of 790 users’ responses in the Birmingham, AL and Miami Beach, FL markets. The study documents preferences and attitudes toward TNCs and highlights similarities and differences in travel behaviors related to local considerations. Moreover, the study uses the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) method to identify predictors for TNC use based on the users’ responses in Birmingham and Miami Beach case studies. Vehicle availability and waiting time emerged as t he only significant predictors for the Birmingham region whereas vehicl e ownership, vehicle use, residency, and prior use of transit and TNC where some of the predictors identified for the Miami Beach area. Understanding the characteristics of TNC users and the leading reasons that drive people towards the use of TNCs services is expected to help transportation agencies and TNC providers in their efforts to plan for transportation services that meet customer needs in the future.
- Hartmans, A. and Leskin, P. (2018) The History of How Uber Went from the Most Feared Startup in the World to Its Massive IPO. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/ubers-history
- National Research Council Committee for Review of Innovative Urban Mobility Services (2015) Between Public and Private Mobility Examining the Rise of Technology-Enabled Transportation Services. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
- Sisiopiku, V.P., Hadi, M., McDonald, N., Steiner, R. and Ramadan, O.E. (2019) Technology Influence on Travel Demand and Behaviors. Final Report to the Southeastern Transportation Research, Innovation, Development and Education Center (STRIDE).
- Shaheen, S. (2018) Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ride Hailing and Pooling. In: Sperling, D., Ed., Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future, 2nd Edition, Island Press, Washington DC, 55-76. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/46p6n2sk https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7_3
- Clewlow, R.R. and Mishra, G.S. (2017) Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
- Vinayak, P.F., Dias, F.F., Astroza, S.F., Pendyala, R.F. and Garikapati, V.M. (2018) Accounting for Multidimensional Dependents among Decision-Makers within a Generalized Model Framework: An Application to Understanding Shared Mobility Service Usage Levels. Transport Policy, 77, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.013
- Chen, Z. (2015) Impact of Ride-Sourcing Services on Travel Habits and Transportation Planning. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/25827
- Circella, G., Alemi, F., Berliner, R., Tiedeman, K., Lee, Y., Fulton, L., Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2017) The Multimodal Behavior of Millennials: Exploring Differences in Travel Choices between Young Adults and Gen Xers in California. Research Report UCD_ITS_RR_17-54, University of California, Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis. https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/themes/ucdavis/pubs/download_pdf.php?id=2872
- Freund, K., Bayne, A., Beck, L., Siegfried, A., Warren, J., Nadel, T. and Natarajan, A. (2020) Characteristics of Ride Share Services for Older Adults in the United States. Journal of Safety Research, 72, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.008
- Rayle, L., Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Dai, D. and Cervero, R. (2014) App-Based, On-Demand Ride Services: Comparing Taxi and Ridesourcing Trips and User Characteristics in San Francisco. University of California Transportation Center (UCTC) Technical Report, UCTC-FR-2014-08.