Self-Perception and General Perception of the Safety Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and People with Ambulatory Disability — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Self-Perception and General Perception of the Safety Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and People with Ambulatory Disability
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
,
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
1 Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
2 Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
For autonomous vehicles (AVs) to receive general acceptance, society must have a positive perception about their safety impact on vulnerable road users. Using data from a statewide random-digit-dialing telephone survey of 1001 adults, this paper examines how New Jersey residents perceive the safety impact of AVs on pedestrians, bicyclists, and people with ambulatory disability. It uses a combination of confirmatory factor analysis and ordered probit models. Confirmatory factor analysis is used to create latent variables on socioeconomic status and built environment. Three ordered probit models are used to examine people’s perception of AV safety impact on each of the three pop ulation groups. The models also examine how frequent walkers, bicyclists, and people with ambulatory disability perceive their own safety as well as the safety of the other two groups. All three models examine the effect of familiarity with AV, gender, age, income, education, race, ethnicity, number of vehicles in household, political party affiliation, as well as built environment and socioeconomic status of the municipalities where the survey respondents live. The analysis showed that men, people with familiarity with the AV concept, Democrats, bicyclists, and people with high household income generally have a positive perception about the safety impact of AVs. While frequent walkers are ambivalent about their own safety as pedestrians, bicyclists have a positive perception about their own safety and the safety of pedestrians, whereas people with ambulatory disability have a strong negative perception about their own safety. The models did not show statistically significant effects of socioeconomic status or built environment of municipalities on AV safety perception.
NHTSA (n.d.) Automated Vehicles for Safety. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC. https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicles-safety
NSTC and USDOT (2020) Ensuring American Leadership in Automated Vehicle Technologies: Automated Vehicles 4.0. National Science and Technology Council and the United States Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
Sperling, D. (2018) Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Island Press, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7
Haboucha, C.J., Ishaq, R. and Shiftan, Y. (2017) User Preferences Regarding Autonomous Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010
Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.F. and Rahwan, I. (2017) Psychological Roadblocks to the Adoption of Self-Driving Vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 694-696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6
Charness, N., Yoon, J.S., Souders, D., Stothart, C. and Yehnert, C. (2018) Predictors of Attitudes toward Autonomous Vehicles: The Roles of Age, Gender, Prior Knowledge, and Personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589
Woldeamanuel, M. and Nguyen, D. (2018) Perceived Benefits and Concerns of Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study of Millennials’ Sentiments of an Emerging Market. Research in Transportation Economics, 71, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.006
Acheampong, R.A. and Cugurullo, F. (2019) Capturing the Behavioural Determinants behind the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles: Conceptual Frameworks and Measurement Models to Predict Public Transport, Sharing and Ownership Trends of Self-Driving Cars. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.009
Hassan, H.M., Ferguson, M.R., Razavi, S. and Vrkljan, B. (2019) Factors That Influence Older Canadians’ Preferences for Using Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Structural Equation Analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118822281
Montoro, L., Useche, S.A., Alonso, F., Lijarcio, I., Bosó-Seguí, P. and Martí-Belda, A. (2019) Perceived Safety and Attributed Value as Predictors of the Intention to Use Autonomous Vehicles: A National Study with Spanish Drivers. Safety Science, 120, 865-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.041
Asmussen, K.E., Mondal, A. and Bhat, C.R. (2020) A Socio-Technical Model of Autonomous Vehicle Adoption Using Ranked Choice Stated Preference Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 121, Article ID: 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102835
Berrada, J., Mouhoubi, I. and Christoforou, Z. (2020) Factors of Successful Implementation and Diffusion of Services Based on Autonomous Vehicles: Users’ Acceptance and Operators’ Profitability. Research in Transportation Economics, 83, Article ID: 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100902
Koul, S. and Eydgahi, A. (2020) The Impact of Social Influence, Technophobia, and Perceived Safety on Autonomous Vehicle Technology Adoption. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 48, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.11332
Raj, A., Kumar, J.A. and Bansal, P. (2020) A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach to Study Barriers to the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 133, 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.013
Souka, M., Böger, D., Decker, R., Stummer, C. and Wiemann, A. (2020) Is More Automation Always Better? An Empirical Study of Customers’ Willingness to Use Autonomous Vehicle Functions. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 20, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2020.105297
Hancock, P.A. (2019) Some Pitfalls in the Promises of Automated and Autonomous Vehicles. Ergonomics, 62, 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1498136
Thompson, J., Read, G.J., Wijnands, J.S. and Salmon, P.M. (2020) The Perils of Perfect Performance; Considering the Effects of Introducing Autonomous Vehicles on Rates of Car vs Cyclist Conflict. Ergonomics, 63, 981-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1739326
Combs, T.S., Sandt, L.S., Clamann, M.P. and McDonald, N.C. (2019) Automated Vehicles and Pedestrian Safety: Exploring the Promise and Limits of Pedestrian Detection. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.024
Wang, J., Zhang, L., Huang, Y. and Zhao, J. (2020) Safety of Autonomous Vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, Article ID: 8867757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757
Deb, S., Rahman, M.M., Strawderman, L.J. and Garrison, T.M. (2018) Pedestrians’ Receptivity toward Fully Automated Vehicles: Research Review and Roadmap for Future Research. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48, 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2799523
Hudson, C.R., Deb, S., Carruth, D.W., McGinley, J. and Frey, D. (2019) Pedestrian Perception of Autonomous Vehicles with External Interacting Features. In: Nunes, I., Ed., Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, AHFE 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 781, Springer, Cham, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94334-3_5
Saleh, K., Hossny, M. and Nahavandi, S. (2017) Towards Trusted Autonomous Vehicles from Vulnerable Road Users Perspective. In: 2017 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, IEEE, Piscataway, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934782
Wang, K., Li, G., Chen, J., Long, Y., Chen, T., Chen, L. and Xia, Q. (2020) The Adaptability and Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles to Pedestrians in Urban China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 145, Article ID: 105692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105692
Blau, M., Akar, G. and Nasar, J. (2018) Driverless Vehicles’ Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12, 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1425781
Latham, A. and Nattrass, M. (2019) Autonomous Vehicles, Car-Dominated Environments, and Cycling: Using an Ethnography of Infrastructure to Reflect on the Prospects of a New Transportation Technology. Journal of Transport Geography, 81, Article ID: 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102539
Saleh, K., Abobakr, A., Nahavandi, D., Iskander, J., Attia, M., Hossny, M. and Nahavandi, S. (2019) Cyclist Intent Prediction Using 3D Lidar Sensors for Fully Automated Vehicles. 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, 27-30 October 2019, 2020-2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917291
Tafidis, P., Pirdavani, A., Brijs, T. and Farah, H. (2019) Can Automated Vehicles Improve Cyclist Safety in Urban Areas? Safety, 5, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5030057
Hagenzieker, M.P., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., van Schagen, I.N.G., de Bruin, J., van Gent, P. and Commandeur, J.J. (2020) Interactions between Cyclists and Automated Vehicles: Results of a Photo Experiment. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 12, 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556
Hou, M., Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., Sharlin, E. and Oehlberg, L. (2020) Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376884
Pettigrew, S., Nelson, J.D. and Norman, R. (2020) Autonomous Vehicles and Cycling: Policy Implications and Management Issues. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7, Article ID: 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100188
von Sawitzky, T., Wintersberger, P., Löcken, A., Frison, A.K. and Riener, A. (2020) Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383022
Li, X., Li, L., Flohr, F., Wang, J., Xiong, H., Bernhard, M., Pan, S., Gavrila, D.M. and Li, K. (2016) A Unified Framework for Concurrent Pedestrian and Cyclist Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18, 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2567418
Lenard, J., Welsh, R. and Danton, R. (2018) Time-to-Collision Analysis of Pedestrian and Pedal-Cycle Accidents for the Development of Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 115, 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.028
Ahmed, S., Huda, M.N., Rajbhandari, S., Saha, C., Elshaw, M. and Kanarachos, S. (2019) Pedestrian and Cyclist Detection and Intent Estimation for Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey. Applied Sciences, 9, 2335. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9112335
Botello, B., Buehler, R., Hankey, S., Mondschein, A. and Jiang, Z. (2019) Planning for Walking and Cycling in an Autonomous-Vehicle Future. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1, Article ID: 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100012
Penmetsa, P., Adanu, E.K., Wood, D., Wang, T. and Jones, S.L. (2019) Perceptions and Expectations of Autonomous Vehicles—A Snapshot of Vulnerable Road User Opinion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010
Pyrialakou, V.D., Gkartzonikas, C., Gatlin, J.D. and Gkritza, K. (2020) Perceptions of Safety on a Shared Road: Driving, Cycling, or Walking near an Autonomous Vehicle. Journal of Safety Research, 72, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.017
USDOT (2018) Preparing for the Future of Transportation: Automated Vehicles 3.0. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
Bennett, R., Vijaygopal, R. and Kottasz, R. (2019) Attitudes towards Autonomous Vehicles among People with Physical Disabilities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 127, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.002
Bennett, R., Vijaygopal, R. and Kottasz, R. (2020) Willingness of People Who Are Blind to Accept Autonomous Vehicles: An Empirical Investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012
Hwang, J., Li, W., Stough, L., Lee, C. and Turnbull, K. (2020) A Focus Group Study on the Potential of Autonomous Vehicles as a Viable Transportation Option: Perspectives from People with Disabilities and Public Transit Agencies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 70, 260-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.007
Rahman, M.M., Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Burch, R. and Smith, B. (2019) How the Older Population Perceives Self-Driving Vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 242-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.002
Kovacs, F.S., McLeod, S. and Curtis, C. (2020) Aged Mobility in the Era of Transportation Disruption: Will Autonomous Vehicles Address Impediments to the Mobility of Ageing Populations? Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.03.004
Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A. and Bunker, J. (2020) Individual Predictors of Autonomous Vehicle Public Acceptance and Intention to Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6, 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040106
Millard-Ball, A. (2018) Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38, 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675674
Riggs, W., Appleyard, B. and Johnson, M. (2020) A Design Framework for Livable Streets in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 8, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2020.1749123
Wang, K. and Akar, G. (2019) Effects of Neighborhood Environments on Perceived Risk of Self-Driving: Evidence from the 2015 and 2017 Puget Sound Travel Surveys. Transportation, 46, 2117-2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10069-9
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Ballew, M., Bergquist, P., Gustafson, A., Goldberg, M. and Wang, X. (2020) Politics & Global Warming. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New Haven.
Sintov, N.D., Abou-Ghalioum, V. and White, L.V. (2020) The Partisan Politics of Low-Carbon Transport: Why Democrats Are More Likely to Adopt Electric Vehicles than Republicans in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, Article ID: 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101576
Fogg, L.M., Hamilton, L.C. and Bell, E.S. (2020) Views of the Highway: Infrastructure Reality, Perceptions, and Politics. SAGE Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020963609
McGuckin, T., Lambert, J., Newton, D., Pearmine, A. and Hubbard, E. (2017) Leveraging the Promise of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Integrated Corridor Management and Operations: A Primer. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
Hulse, L.M., Xie, H. and Galea, E.R. (2018) Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles: Relationships with Road Users, Risk, Gender and Age. Safety Science, 102, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
FBI (2019) New Jersey: Offences Known to Law Enforcement, by City. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington DC. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-8/table-8-state-cuts/new_jersey.xls
Walk Score (n.d.) Walk Score ® . https://www.walkscore.com/NJ
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M.R. (2008) Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.