A Nationwide Evaluation of the State of Practice of Performance Measurements for Intelligent Transportation Systems
- 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, USA
- 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, USA
- 3 Traffic Simulation & Safety Analysis, Design Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, USA
Abstract
State departments of transportation’s (DOTs) decisions to invest resources to expand or implement intelligent transportation systems (ITS) programs or even retire existing infrastructure need to be based on performance evaluations. Nonetheless, an apparent gap exists between the need for ITS performance measurements and the actual implementation. The evidence available points to challenges in the ITS performance measurement processes. This paper evaluated the state of practice of performance measurement for ITS across the US and provided insights. A comprehensive literature review assessed the use of performance measures by DOTs for monitoring implemented ITS programs. Based on the gaps identified through the literature review, a nationwide qualitative survey was used to gather insights from key stakeholders on the subject matter and presented in this paper. From the data gathered, performance measurement of ITS is fairly integrated into ITS programs by DOTs, with most agencies considering the process beneficial. There, however, exist reasons that prevent agencies from measuring ITS performance to greater detail and quality. These include lack of data, fragmented or incomparable data formats, the complexity of the endeavor, lack of data scientists, and difficulty assigning responsibilities when inter-agency collaboration is required. Additionally, DOTs do not benchmark or compare their ITS performance with others for reasons that include lack of data, lack of guidance or best practices, and incomparable data formats. This paper is relevant as it provides insights expected to guide DOTs and other agencies in developing or reevaluating their ITS performance measurement processes.
- Grant, M., Bauer, J., Plaskon, T. and Mason, J. (2010) Advancing Metropolitan Planning for Operations: An Objectives-Driven, Performance-Based Approach. A Guidebook. United States Department of Transportation, FHWA. National Operations Center of Excellence, February. FHWA-HOP-10-026.
- U.S. Department of Transportation (2015, April 3) Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). https://www.transportation.gov/map21
- U.S. Department of Transportation (2015, December 4) The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act or “FAST Act”. https://www.transportation.gov/fastact
- Grant, M., D’Ignazio, J., Bond, A. and McKeeman, A. (2013) Performance Based Planning and Programming Guidebook. ICF International, Inc. United States Department of Transportation, FHWA-HEP-13-041.
- Clark, J., Neuner, M., Sethi, S., et al. (2017) Transportation Systems Management and Action. FHWA-HOP-17-025. FHWA. U.S. Department of Transportation.
- United States Department of Transportation. Architecture Reference for Cooperative and Intelligent Transportation. https://local.iteris.com/arc-it
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). AASHTO Committee on Transportation System Operations. https://systemoperations.transportation.org/membership
- Gresham Smith and Partners. Alabama Department of Transportation (2015) Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Business Plan.
- California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2015, March) Strategic Management Plan 2015-2020. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/sustainability/documents/caltrans-strategic-mgmt-plan-033015-a11y.pdf
- Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Minnesota Statewide Regional ITS Architecture, Version 2018. Overview Volume, December 2018. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/its/projects/2016-2020/itsarchitecture/overview-volume.pdf
- New Jersey Department of Transportation. Division of Statewide Traffic Operations. New Jersey Statewide ITS Architecture—Final Report, February 18, 2005. https://www.nj.gov/transportation/eng/elec/ITS/pdf/ITS_Architecture_v1.01.pdf
- Gresham Smith and Partners. Alabama Department of Transportation (2014) Alabama Statewide ITS Architecture, Final Report.
- Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (2020) Florida Statewide ITS Architecture. https://teo.fdot.gov/architecture/architectures/statewide/index.html