Decision Support System for Assessment & Selection of Optimum Mass Transit Option
- 1 Strategy & Cooperate Governance Sector, Roads & Transport Authority, Dubai, UAE
- 2 ESCP Business School, Dubai, UAE
- 3 ESCP Business School, Dubai, UAE
- 4 ESCP Business School, Dubai, UAE
- 5 ESCP Business School, Dubai, UAE
- 6 ESCP Business School, Dubai, UAE
Abstract
Many cities in the world are aspiring to have a world-class, sustainable public transport system. However, the cost of building new mass transport systems, especially metro projects, is so high it can lead to the postponement of such projects. New mass transit modes such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Trackless Tram (TT) and suspended systems are continuously emerging. Some of the new emerging modes can deliver high capacity that can be equivalent to Light Rail Transit and Metro Systems but with significantly less cost. This research is meant to develop a comprehensive approach for comparing & assessing several aspects of different mass transit modes. Different research tools, including in-depth literature review, content, and case study analysis, multicriteria assessment, benchmarking and efficiency analysis, are used to reach conclusions for optimum mass transit options from different perspectives.
- Vuchic, V.R. (2007) Urban Transit Systems and Technology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470168066
- Abbas, K.A. (2012) BRT Systems: Place & Importance in the World. Opening Paper Session. Proceedings of TRANS IST 2012 5 th Transportation Symposium and Exhibition , Istanbul, 27-30 November 2012, 24-65.
- Connect Greater Washington (2014) The Region’s Transit System Plan.
- Meyer, M.D. (2016) Transportation Planning Handbook. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174660
- Brown, T. (2022, March 30) Stirling to Welcome Trackless Tram as Part of Australian-First Trial with Curtin University. Perth. https://www.perthnow.com.au/local-news/perthnow-stirling/stirling-to-welcome-trackless-tram-as-part-of-australian-first-trial-with-curtin-university-c-6205032
- https://brtdata.org/
- Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) (2007) Bus Rapid Transit: A Canadian Perspective. Issue Paper 25.
- Currie, G. (2006) Bus Rapid Transit in Australasia: Performance, Lessons Learned and Futures. Journal of Public Transportation , 9, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.9.3.1
- Daganzo, C.F. and Ouyang, Y. (2019) Public Transportation Systems: Basic Principles of System Design, Operations Planning and Real-Time Control. World Scientific.
- Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (2009) Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making Project No. FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.1 United States Department of Transportation.
- Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) & GIZ (2012) BRT Standard 2012 Version 1.
- Pierre, L. (1995) Public Transport: The Challenge an Overview. In: Public Transport : The Challenge , International Union (Association) of Public Transport, 7-10.
- Levinson, H., et al . (2003) Bus Rapid Transit—Volume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 90.
- Lowe, M. and La, M. (2012) U.S. Bus Rapid Transit—10 High-Quality Features and the Value Chain of Firms That Provide Them. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University.
- Mulley, C., Nelson, J. and Ison, S. (2021) The Routledge Handbook of Public Transport. Routledge.
- Newman, P., Hargroves, K., Davies-Slate, S., Conley, D., Verschuer, M., Mouritz, M., et al . (2019) The Trackless Tram: Is It the Transit and City Shaping Catalyst We Have Been Waiting for? Journal of Transportation Technologies , 9, 31-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2019.91003