Modeling Incident Duration Using Lasso and Ridge Regressions
- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA
- 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA
Abstract
Traffic incidents significantly disrupt freeway operations, causing delays, congestion, fuel waste, and economic losses. Effective incident management requires not only rapid detection and clearance but also accurate real-time prediction of incident duration, a capability currently lacking in most Traffic Management Centers (TMCs). This study develops machine learning models to predict incident duration based on real-time responses and evolving incident conditions. The analysis uses incident data from the I-15 corridor in Las Vegas, Nevada, encompassing 643 recorded incidents, of which 272 were further documented in a novel Video Snapshots Dataset (VSDS) that captures 15-second visual records of incident characteristics. Key incident attributes, including total and average blockage duration, were extracted to enrich model training. Three predictive approaches were evaluated: Lasso Regression and Ridge Regression with 10-fold cross-validation, with comparison with Multiple Linear Regression. Among these, Ridge Regression achieved the highest predictive accuracy, demonstrating its effectiveness for real-time estimation of incident duration. These findings provide a foundation for enhancing TMC operations by enabling more reliable travel time updates and proactive traffic management strategies.
- NHTSA (2017) Summary of Motor Vehicle Crashes (Final Edition): 2015 Data. Report No. DOT HS 812 376, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
- NHTSA (2023) Summary of Motor Vehicle Crashes: 2021 Data. Report No. DOT HS 813 515, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
- Garib, A., Radwan, A.E. and Al-Deek, H. (1997) Estimating Magnitude and Duration of Incident Delays. Journal of Transportation Engineering , 123, 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123:6(459)
- Valenti, G., Lelli, M. and Cucina, D. (2010) A Comparative Study of Models for the Incident Duration Prediction. European Transport Research Review , 2, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-010-0031-4
- Khattak, A., Wang, X. and Zhang, H. (2012) Incident Management Integration Tool: Dynamically Predicting Incident Durations, Secondary Incident Occurrence and Incident Delays. IET Intelligent Transport Systems , 6, 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2011.0013
- Pereira, F.C., Rodrigues, F. and Ben-Akiva, M. (2013) Text Analysis in Incident Duration Prediction. Transportation Research Part C : Emerging Technologies , 37, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.10.002
- Corbally, R., Yang, L. and Malekjafarian, A. (2024) Predicting the Duration of Motorway Incidents Using Machine Learning. European Transport Research Review , 16, Article No. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-024-00632-6
- Yu, B. and Xia, Z. (2012) A Methodology for Freeway Incident Duration Prediction Using Computerized Historical Database. In: Fang, F.C., Wei, H. and Wang, Y.P., Eds., CICTP 2012: Multimodal Transportation Systems — Convenient , Safe , Cost - Effective , Efficient , American Society of Civil Engineers, 3463-3474. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412442.351
- Khattak, A.J., Schofer, J.L. and Wang, M. (1995) A Simple Time Sequential Procedure for Predicting Freeway Incident Duration. I V H S Journal , 2, 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10248079508903820
- Lee, J.Y., Chung, J.H. AND Son, B. (2009) Incident Clearance Time Analysis for Korean Freeways Using Structural Equation Model. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies , 7. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastpro.2009.0.360.0
- Khattak, A.J., Liu, J., Wali, B., Li, X. and Ng, M. (2016) Modeling Traffic Incident Duration Using Quantile Regression. Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board , 2554, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.3141/2554-15