Evaluation of Air-Coupled Acoustic Emission Detection for Internal Rail Defects
- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- 4 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- 5 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- 6 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Abstract
Internal rail defects present significant safety risks. Acoustic Emission (AE) technology has emerged as a promising technique for detecting these defects. The goal of this research is to investigate the characteristics of AE signals from internal rail defects by employing air-coupled optical microphones. This first phase of the research was to evaluate the propagation characteristics of AE signals in lab-controlled pencil lead break (PLB) tests with two scenarios: signal attenuation in the air and within the rail. These tests were particularly designed to assess the prototype’s performance under varying conditions. The second phase involved real-world field tests at two test sites: the Nevada State Railroad Museum and the MxV Rail in Colorado. Data collected from both sites were analyzed to assess the effectiveness of detecting defects in rail. The test results revealed two key findings. First, the AE detection rate varied significantly between tests: 8.3% in the Nevada field test and 13.3% in the MxV Rail test. This difference suggests that AE detection rates may be influenced by defect size and conditions in the field environment. Second, wavelet packet power (WPP) analysis highlighted clear differences between PLB-induced AE signals and those from actual rail defects. While PLB signals displayed broader energy distribution across the frequency range, the AE signals from rail defects exhibited concentrated and intense peaks within the 100 - 160 kHz range. Overall, the non-contact sensor system demonstrated promise for detecting internal rail defects, effectively capturing AE signals.
- Rizzo, P. and Coccia, S. (2009) Noncontact Rail Monitoring by Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring , 2397, 2397-2410. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061626.shm041
- Li, D. (2018) Rail Crack Monitoring Using Acoustic Emission Technique. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8348-8
- Fischer, B. (2016) Optical Microphone Hears Ultrasound. Nature Photonics , 10, 356-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.95
- Lanza di Scalea, F., Rizzo, P., Coccia, S., Bartoli, I., Fateh, M., Viola, E., et al. (2005) Non-Contact Ultrasonic Inspection of Rails and Signal Processing for Automatic Defect Detection and Classification. Insight — Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring , 47, 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.47.6.346.66449
- Mariani, S., Nguyen, T., Zhu, X. and Lanza di Scalea, F. (2017) Field Test Performance of Noncontact Ultrasonic Rail Inspection System. Journal of Transportation Engineering , Part A : Systems , 143. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000026
- Kim, N., Sohn, H. and Han, S. (2012) Rail Inspection Using Noncontact Laser Ultrasonics. Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing , 32, 696-702. https://doi.org/10.7779/jksnt.2012.32.6.696
- Lanza di Scalea, F., Zhu, X., Capriotti, M., Liang, A.Y., Mariani, S. and Sternini, S. (2017) Passive Extraction of Dynamic Transfer Function from Arbitrary Ambient Excitations: Application to High-Speed Rail Inspection from Wheel-Generated Waves. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation , Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems , 1, Article ID: 011005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037517
- Bruzelius, K. and Mba, D. (2004) An Initial Investigation on the Potential Applicability of Acoustic Emission to Rail Track Fault Detection. NDT & E International , 37, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.02.001
- Nivesrangsan, P., Steel, J.A. and Reuben, R.L. (2007) Source Location of Acoustic Emission in Diesel Engines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing , 21, 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.010
- Zhang, X., Feng, N., Wang, Y. and Shen, Y. (2015) Acoustic Emission Detection of Rail Defect Based on Wavelet Transform and Shannon Entropy. Journal of Sound and Vibration , 339, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.11.021
- Li, D., Wang, Y., Yan, W. and Ren, W. (2020) Acoustic Emission Wave Classification for Rail Crack Monitoring Based on Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transform and Multi-Branch Convolutional Neural Network. Structural Health Monitoring , 20, 1563-1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720922797