How to Detect and Remove Temporal Autocorrelation in Vehicular Crash Data
- 1 University of Missouri-Columbia, MO, USA
Abstract
Temporal autocorrelation (also called serial correlation) refers to the relationship between successive values (i.e. lags) of the same variable. Although it has long been a major concern in time series models, however, in-depth treatments of temporal autocorrelation in modeling vehicle crash data are lacking. This paper presents several test statistics to detect the amount of temporal autocorrelation and its level of significance in crash data. The tests employed are: 1) the Durbin-Watson (DW); 2) the Breusch-Godfrey (LM); and 3) the Ljung-Box Q (LBQ). When temporal autocorrelation is statistically significant in crash data, it could adversely bias the parameter estimates. As such, if present, temporal autocorrelation should be removed prior to use the data in crash modeling. Two procedures are presented in this paper to remove the temporal autocorrelation: 1) Differencing; and 2) the Cochrane-Orcutt method.
- King, M.L. (1981) The Alternative Durbin-Watson Test: An Assessment of Durbin and Watson’s Choice of Statistic. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 51-66.
- Anderson, T.K. (1984) On the Theory of Testing Serial Correlation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 88-116.
- King, M.L. (1983) The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation: Bounds for Regressions Using Monthly Data. Journal of Econometrics, 21, 357-366.
- Lord, D. and Mannering, F. (2010) The Statistical Analysis of Crash Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 44, 291-305.
- Washington, P., Karlaftis, G. and Mannering, F. (2010) Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. 2nd Edition, Chapman Hall CRC, Boca Raton.
- Savolainen, P., Mannering, F., Lord, D. and Quddus, M. (2011) The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-Injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1666-1676.
- Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814365
- Caliendo, C., Guida, M. and Parisi, A. (2007) A Crash-Prediction Model for Multilane Roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 657-670.
- Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
- Gujarati, D. (1992) Essentials of Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Miaou, S.P., Song, J.J. and Mallick, B.K. (2003) Roadway Traffic Crash Mapping: A Space-Time Modeling Approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 33-57.
- Lord, D. and Bonneson, A. (2007) Development of Accident Modification Factors for Rural Frontage road Segments in Texas. Transportation Research Record, 2023, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2023-03
- Hilbe, J. (2014) Modeling Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139236065
- Thomas, R.L. (1993) Introductory Econometrics: Theory and Applications. 2nd Edition, Longman, London.
- Studenmund, A.H. (2001) Using Econometrics—A Practical Guide. Addison-Wes- ley-Longman, London.
- Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M. and Reinsel, G.C. (1994) Time Series Analysis—Fore- casting and Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.