Evaluation of Sample Taxicab Security Cameras
- 1 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 2 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 3 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 4 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 5 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 6 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
- 7 Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA
Abstract
Background: Taxicab drivers have high homicide rates compared to all worker occupations. To help taxi fleets select effective taxicab security cameras, this project tested eight sample taxicab security cameras for determining their photographic quality which correlated to the effectiveness of in-taxicab facial identification. Methods: Five photographic quality metric thresholds: 1) resolution, 2) highlight dynamic range, 3) shadow dynamic range, 4) lens distortion, and 5) shutter speed, were employed to evaluate the photographic quality of the sample cameras. Waterproof tests and fire-resistive tests on recording memory cards were conducted to determine the memory card survivability in water and simulated fire. Results: The Full-HD (1920 × 1080 pixels), HD (1280 × 720 pixels) and dual-lens VGA (2 × 640 × 480 pixels with wide-angle and telephoto lenses) cameras performed well in resolution tests in daylight conditions. The resolution of a single-lens VGA (640 × 480 pixels) camera did not meet the resolution minimum requirements. All of the recording memory cards passed the five-meter/72-hour waterproof test. A fire resistant chamber made with one fire insulation material could protect a single memory card at 538 °C /1000 ° F for a five-minute simulated fire test. Conclusions: Single-lens VGA-resolution (640 × 480 pixels) cameras are not suggested for use as security cameras in taxicabs with two or more rows of seats. The recording memory cards can survive 5-meter/72-hour waterproof tests. The memory card chamber built with an existing heat insulation material can protect an individual memory card during 538 °C (1000 ° F )/5-minute fire resistance oven-test.
- NIOSH (2001) Fatal Injuries to Civilian Workers in the United States, 1980-1995. DHHS (NIOSH) Pub. No. 2001-129S.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) 2014 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, Table A-6. Fatal Occupational Injuries Resulting from Transportation Incidents and Homicides by Occupation, All United States. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cftb0291.pdf
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) 2014 Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey, Household Data Annual Averages, 18. Employed Persons by Detailed Industry, Sex, Race, and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/cps/aa2014/cpsaat18.pdf
- Menéndez, C.C. (2012) Taxicab Driver Safety. Proceedings of International Association of Transportation Regulators, 2012 Conference, Washington DC, November 2012, 15-17.
- Government of Tasmania (2004) Taxi Industry Amendment (Security Cameras) Regula-tions. Government of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/num_reg/tiacr20042004n21609/s5.html
- Government of Queensland (2006) Queensland Taxi Security Camera Specifications. Government of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
- Government of New South Wales (2007) NSW Taxi Driver Guide to a Safer Workplace. Government of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
- Government of Victoria (2001) Victorian Taxi-Cabs Security Camera Specifications. Government of Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
- Taxi & Limousine Commission of New York (2000) Taxi Cab Notes 4.23.2000 v1.b. Taxi & Limousine Commission (New York, NY, USA) March 2000 Press Release, Industry Notice #00-08. Taxi & Limousine Commission of New York, New York.
- Government of Portland (2003) Working Draft, Camera Needs and Wants Matrix Prescriptive Specification. Government of Portland, Portland, Oregon, 17 October 2003.
- Government of New South Wales (2007) Taxi Industry Safety and Security Taskforce Final Report. Government of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
- Harries, L. and Kozubal, J. (2004) Camera Effective in Reducing Taxicab Crime. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference of the International Association of Transportation Regulators, Charleston, September 2004.
- Ramzan, S. and Christian, A. (2007) Report of the Sheffield Taxi Safety Camera Pilot Study. Sheffield Taxi Camera Safety Project, Sheffield City Council. Sheffield, UK, February 2007. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/149947/response/369138/attach/3/1%20Report%20Draft%20V10.pdf