Social Profitability Threshold of High Speed Railway:A Benefit-Cost Analysis
- 1
- 2
- 3
Abstract
In this study, the benefit-cost analysis technique for projects evaluation is applied to determine the minimum level of demand that makes a high-speed rail project economically viable in Spain. To get this goal, it is nec- essary to take into account not only the costs and benefits of the high speed railway but also the analysis of the costs and benefits linked to other alternative transport modes, such as plane, private car or bus. The re- sults show that the high-speed rail studied is socially profitable from a traffic volume of 6.5 million passen- gers and for a social discount rate of 4%. Given the benefits associated with network effects, which magni- tude grows parallel to the extension of the high-speed network, this threshold could be significantly reduced in subsequent projects.
- D. A. Aschauer, “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Jo- urnal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 23, 1989, pp.7- 7-100. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
- PEIT, Plan Estratégico de Infraestructuras y Transportes 2005-2020. Madrid, Department of Transportation, 2005.
- COM, 2001/370-European Commission, WHITE PAPER, “European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide,” Brussels, COM (2001) 370 final.
- N. Adler, C. Nash and E. A. J. H. Pels, “High-Speed Rail&Air Transport Competition: Game Engineering as Tool for Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Tinbergen Institute Discussion, , 2010, Paper No. 08/103/3.
- G. De Rus and C. Nash, “In what circumstances is investment in HSR worthwhile?”.Working paper 4th, Annual Conference on “Railroad Industry Structure, Competition and Investment,” Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2006.
- G. De Rus, “The BCA of HSR: Should the Government Invest in High Speed Rail Infrastructure?” The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2011, pp.1-26.
- P. Coto-Millán and V. Inglada, “Social Benefits of Investment Projects: the Case for High-Speed Rail,” In Essays on Microeconomics and Industrial Organization, Second Edition, Physica-Verlag, Springer-Verlag Company, Germany, 2003, Chapter 23.
- J. Dodgson, “Railways Costs and Closures,” Journal of Transports Economics and Policy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1984, pp. 219-235.
- G. De Rus and V. Inglada, “Análisis Coste-Beneficio del Tren de Alta Velocidad en Espa?a,” Revista de Economía Aplicada, Vol. 1, No 3, 1993, pp. 27-48.
- G. De Rus and V. Inglada, “Cost-Benefit Analysis of the High-Speed Train in Spain,” The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 175-188. doi:10.1007/s001680050044
- P. Coto-Millán and V. Inglada, “Market Failures: The Case for Road Congestion Externalities,” In Essays on Microeconomics and Industrial Organization, Second Edition, Physica-Verlag, Springer-Verlag Company, Germany, 2003, Chapter 22.
- P. Coto-Millán and V. Inglada, “Innovación en el Transporte: El Tren de Alta Velocidad,” Economía Industrial, No. 353, 2003, pp. 83-88.
- O. álvarez and J. A. Herce, “Líneas Ferroviarias de Alta Velocidad en Espa?a,” Economía Aplicada, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1993, pp. 5-32.
- V. Inglada, “El Papel de las Infraestructuras en la Competitividad y el Desarrollo Económico,” Estudios Territoriales, Vol. 1, No. 97, 1993, pp. 397-409.