Composite Sustainable Indicators Framework for Cost Assessment of Land Transport Mode in Lebanon Cities
- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
- 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract
The aim of the work performed in this paper is to present a composite indicators framework to guide sustainable transportation planning in Lebanon by assessing the sustainability marginal cost of Land Transport modes used mostly based on ICE (internal combustion engine) auto dependence. The framework covers 6 indicators of the triple bottom line of sustainability (economy, society, and environment): operating cost, energy consumption, noise exposure, congestion delay, emissions, and safety. The framework process follows an evaluation toolkit that monitors the cost implied from listed individual indicators of transport mode. Moreover, this evaluation methodology can be used to estimate to an acceptable degree the cost variation resulting from transport mode modifications within same geographical zone. This cost variance is the main interest of investors and decision makers seeking profits and successful results of their transportation planning process. A case study is executed in Lebanon GBA (Greater Beirut Area), where the annual cost of an alternative consisting of light rail transit (LRT) to passenger cars (PC) system is assessed; applying the stated methodology. Results show clearly an environmental amelioration with a reduction of 4,651,817,100 MJ of energy and 181,936 ton of CO 2 emissions in addition to a saving of 255,643,035$ annually.
- The President’s Council on Sustainable Development (1997) ISC’s Elements of a Sustainable Community Task Force Report, Washington. https://www.iscvt.org/impact/definition-sustainable-community/
- Hall, R.P. (2006) Understanding and Applying the Concept of Sustainable Development to Transportation Planning and Decision-Making in the U.S. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.
- Kelly, C. (2007) Origins of Sustainability Report for Task, Appraisal of Sustainability Project Report. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- U.N. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (A/42/427).
- Jones, C., Baker, M., Carter, J., Jay, S., Short, M. and Wood, C. (2005) Strategic Environmental Assessment and Land Use Planning: An International Evaluation. Sterling, VA: Earthscan, London.
- Robèrt, K.-H. (2009) The Natural Step. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.
- Hawken, P, Lovins, A. and Lovins, L.H. (1999) Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.
- Vuchic, V.R. (1999) Transportation for Livable Cities. Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research, United States.
- Gudmundsson, H., Hall, R.P., Marsden, G. and Zietsman, J. (2015) Sustainable Transportation: Indicators, Frameworks, and Performance Management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
- Banister, D. (2008) the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
- Munier, N. (2005) Introduction to Sustainability Road to a Better Future. Springer, Dordrecht.
- Litman, T. (2013) Well Measured—Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.
- ECTS (2001) Transport Safety Performance Indicators. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels.
- Hakkinen (2007) Trends and Indicators for Monitoring the EU Thematic Strategy on Sustainable Development of Urban Environment. VTT Technical Research Centre, Finland.
- Marsden, G. and Thanos, S. (2008) Measuring Wider Economic Benefits of Transport: A Case Study in Good Practice for Indicator Selection, Deliverable C2, DISTILLATE Project.