Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
- 2 Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
- 3 School of Health and Management, Abdou Moumouni Dioffo University, Niamey, Niger
Abstract
This work involves the evaluation of dry port competitiveness through analysis of efficiencies for selected dry ports in Africa. Five dry ports were selected and analysis carried out over a period of four years. The dry ports considered were Mojo and Kality in Ethiopia, Mombasa in Kenya, Isaka in Tanzania and Casablanca in Casablanca, Morocco. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied for this work. Container throughputs for the various ports under consideration were used as the output variable for the data analysis model, while the number of reach stackers, the number of tractors, the number of forklifts and the size of the dry port were used as the input variables. From the results, the Mombasa dry port was found to be the most efficient with an average score of approximately 1 over the period under consideration. Casablanca was the second efficient dry port with an average score of 0.762, while Isaka was the least efficient with an average score of 0.142. This research is significant since the African countries have embraced the dry port concept, as witnessed in the huge investments in this sector, and would serve to highlight areas that need improvement for the few existing dry port facilities, most of which are undergoing expansion as well as modernization.
- PIDG (2015) PIDG Project Fact Sheet Africa: Niger Dry Port.
- Council, N.S. (2016) Dry Ports. https://www.shipperscouncil.gov.ng/inland-dry-port
- Elshaday, W.G. (2016) Assessment of the Performance of Dry Ports in Ethiopia Using SCOR Method. Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa.
- World Port Source. http://www.worldportsource.com/ports/commerce/KEN_Port_of_Mombasa_1365.php
- Bentaleb, F., Mouhsene, F., Charif, M. and Alami, S. (2016) Dry Port-Seaport System Development: Application of the Product Life Cycle Theory. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 1, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.22532/jtl.267840
- Farrell, M. (1957) Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Efficiency, 120, 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
- Szczepura, A., Davis, C., Fletcher, J. and Bousoffiane, A. (1992) Applied Data Envelopment Analysis in Healthcare: The Relative Efficiency of NHS General Practices. Warwick Business School Research Bureau, Coventry.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- Wang, T., Song, D.-W. and Cullinane, K. (2003) Container Port Production Efficiency: A Comparative Study of DEA and FDH Approaches. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 698-713.
- Martinez, B.E., Diaz, A.R., Navarro, I.M. and Ravelo, M.T. (1999) A Study of the Efficiency of Spanish Port Authorities Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, 26, 237-257.
- Tongzon, J. (2001) Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using DEA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00049-X
- Itoh, H. (2002) Efficiency Changes at Major Container Ports in Japan: A Window Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14, 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-940X.00052
- Baros, C. (2003) The Measurement of Efficiency of Portuguese Seaport Authorities with DEA. International Journal of Transport Economics, 30, 335-354.
- Barros, C. and Athanassiou, M. (2004) Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100099