Multiple Impact of Integrated Watershed Management in Low Rainfall Semi-Arid Region: A Case Study from Eastern Rajasthan, India
- 1 Resilient Dryland Systems, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
- 2 Resilient Dryland Systems, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
- 3 Resilient Dryland Systems, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
- 4 Resilient Dryland Systems, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
Abstract
The agriculture in low rainfall areas of eastern Rajasthan, India is characterized by high risks from drought, degraded natural resources and pervasive poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition. In this region, water is the main limiting factor for upgrading rainfed agriculture. For such areas integrated watershed management is recognized as a potential approach for agriculture growth and rehabilitation of fragile and degraded lands. At Gokulpura - Goverdhanpura village in Bundi eastern Rajasthan, India an integrated watershed project was implemented using the holistic systems approach. This paper discusses the impacts of this watershed program on bio-physical, socio-economic, environmental and ecological parameters. Results indicate that due to watershed interventions the groundwater availability has substantially increased which brought changes in cropping patterns with high value crops. Significant increases in irrigated area, cropping intensity along with diversification of crops from traditional to commercial cash crops were recorded. The watershed program also significantly improved the socio-economic status of the watershed community. It has increased the income and reduced poverty of the people in the watershed. The watershed interventions generated good employment opportunities and significantly reduced the migration of both skilled and unskilled labor from the watershed village to urban areas. It has also improved the environmental quality and ecological status in the watershed. The watershed interventions increased the vegetative index or greenery, reduced runoff, soil loss, and land degradations and improved the bio-diversity in fragile ecosystems. Overall, the integrated watershed program at Gokulpura-Goverdhanpura provided resilience by ensuring continued and sustainable multiple outputs, besides soil and water conservation and other positive environmental effects.
- J. Rockstrom, L. Karlberg, S. P. Wani, J. Barron, N. Hatibu, T. Oweis, A. Bruggeman, J. Farahani and Z. Qiang, “Managing Water in Rain-Fed Agriculture—The Need for a Paradigm Shift,” Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2010, pp. 543-550.
- Government of India, “Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects,” Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi, 2008.
- K. Chopra, G. K. Kadekodi and M. N. Murthy, “Participatory Development, People and Common Property Resources,” Sage Publication, New Delhi, 1990.
- R. S. Deshpande and M. N. Murthy, “Watershed Development Approach and Experience of National Watershed Development Program in the Country,” Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1999, pp. 453-469.
- C. H. Hanumantha Rao, “Watershed Development in India: Recent Experience and Emerging Issues,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 35, No. 45, 2000, pp. 3943-3947.
- J. Kerr, G. Pangare, L. V. Pangare and P. J. George, “An Evaluation of Dryland Watershed Development Projects in India,” EPTD Discussion Paper 68, Environment and Policy Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, 2000.
- S. P. Wani, K. H. Anantha, T. K. Sreedevi, R. Sudi, S. N. Singh and M. D’Souza, “Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Watershed Development: Evidence from the Indian Semi-Arid Tropics,” Journal of Sustainable Watershed Science & Management, Vol. 1, 2011, pp. 10-20.
- V. R. Reddy, “Sustainable Watershed Management: Institutional Perspective,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 35, No. 38, 2000, pp. 3435-3444.
- P. K. Joshi, A. K. Jha, S. P. Wani, T. K. Sreedevi and F. A. Shaheen, “Impact of Watershed Program and Conditions for Success: A Meta-Analysis Approach,” Global Theme on Agro Ecosystems Report No. 46, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, 2008, p. 24.
- B. Shiferaw, C. Bantilan and S. P. Wani, “Policy and Institutional Issues and Impacts of Integrated Watershed Management: Experiences and Lessons from Asia,” In: B. Shiferaw and K. P. C. Rao, Eds., Integrated Management of Watersheds for Agricultural Diversification and Sustainable Livelihoods in Eastern and Central Africa: Lessons and Experiences from Semi-Arid South Asia, Proceedings of the International Workshop, Nairobi, 6-7 December 2004, pp. 37-52.
- K. Palanisami, and S. Kumar “Impact Assessment of Select Watersheds in Coimbatore District of Tamil Nadu,” Water Technology Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 2004, p. 80.