Pre- and Post-Construction Assessment of Nutrient Concentrations at Shallow Water Habitat Restoration Sites on the Lower Missouri River — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Pre- and Post-Construction Assessment of Nutrient Concentrations at Shallow Water Habitat Restoration Sites on the Lower Missouri River
Loss of shallow water habitat (SWH) is hypothesized as a factor contributing to the decline of native Missouri River fishes, including the endangered pallid sturgeon. As a result, the restoration of SWH is a high priority in this large river system. Restoration activities often include constructing side channel chutes; however, limited information exists on the potential negative, unintended effects of chute construction activities on water quality. This study was designed to better understand the possible effects of chute construction, both initially and as chute development continues, on Missouri River nutrient concentrations. Our first objective was to determin e if the addition of sediment from proposed chute locations to river water samples ( i.e. , elutriate samples) increased nutrient concentrations relative to water-only river samples collected just upstream of the proposed chute locations or river water samples collected from eight long-term water quality monitoring stations. Our second objective was to determine if nutrient concentrations of river samples monitored during 2009 and 2010 increased after water passed through previously-constructed chutes. Nutrient concentrations of elutriate samples were not significantly higher than river water samples collected just upstream of the proposed chute locations; the same was true for Missouri River water samples collected from seven of eight long-term water quality monitoring stations. Furthermore, monitoring of nutrient concentrations collected from water samples at the outlet of previously-constructed chutes were not significantly higher than water samples collected at the upstream inlet of these chutes. Our results suggest that individual SWH chute construction projects designed to restore some of the natural form and function of the Missouri River are unlikely to significantly increase Missouri Rivernutrient concentrations initially or as these chutes continue to develop.
KeywordsShallow Water HabitatMissouri RiverRestorationNitrogenPhosphorus
L. W. Hesse and G. E. Mestl, “An Alternative Hydrograph for the Missouri River Based on the Precontrol Condition,” North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1993, pp. 360-366. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1993)013 2.3.CO;2
D. L. Galat, L. H. Fredrickson, D. D. Humburg, K. J. Bataille, J. R. Bodie, J. Dohrenwend, G. T. Gelwicks, J. E. Havel, D. L. Helmers, J. B. Hooker, J. R. Jones, M. F. Knowlton, J. Kubisiak, J. Mazourek, A. C. McColpin, R. B. Renken and R. D. Semlitsch, “Flooding to Restore Connectivity of Regulated, Large-River Wetlands,” Bio- science, Vol. 48, No. 9, 1998, pp. 721-733. doi:10.2307/1313335
R. B. Jacobson and D. L. Galat, “Design of a Naturalized Flow Regime—An Example from the Lower Missouri River, USA,” Ecohydrology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 81-104. doi:10.1002/eco.9
R. H. Meade and J. A. Moody, “Causes for the Decline of Suspended-Sediment Discharge in the Mississippi River System, 1940-2007,” Hydrologic Processes, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2010, pp. 35-49.
National Research Council, “Missouri River Planning: Recognizing and Incorporating Sediment Management,” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2011.
L. A. Sprague, M. L. Clark, D. L. Rus, R. B. Zelt, J. L. Flynn and J. V. Davis, “Nutrient and Suspended-Sediment Trends in the Missouri River Basin, 1993-2003,” US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5231, 2006.
L. W. Hesse and W. Sheets, “The Missouri River Hydrosystem,” Fisheries, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1993, pp. 5-14. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018 2.0.CO;2
US Fish and Wildlife Service, “Biological Opinion on the Operation of the Missouri River Main Stem Reservoir System, Operation and Maintenance of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, and Operation of the Kansas River Reservoir System,” US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, 2000.
National Research Council, “The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery,” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers, “Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,” Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Project, 2003.
L. W. Hesse, J. C. Schmulbach, J. M. Carr, K. D. Keenlyne, D. G. Unkenholz, J. W. Robinson and G. E. Mestl, “Missouri River Fishery Resources in Relation to Past, Present, and Future Stresses,” Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 106, 1989, pp. 352-371.
D. L. Galat, C. R. Berry, W. M. Gardner, J. C. Hendrickson, G. E. Mestl, G. J. Power, C. Stone and M. R. Winston, “Spatiotemporal Patterns and Changes in Missouri River Fishes,” In: J. N. Rinne, R. M. Hughes and B. Calamusso, Eds., Historical Changes in Large River Fish Assemblages of the Americas, Symposium 45, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 2005, pp. 249-291.
J. L. Funk and J. W. Robinson, “Changes in the Channel of the Lower Missouri River and Effects on Fish and Wildlife,” Missouri Department of Conservation Aquatic Series No. 11, Jefferson City, 1974.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, “Amendment to the 2000 Biological Opinion on the Operation of the Missouri River Main Stem Reservoir System, Operation and Maintenance of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, and Operation of the Kansas River Reservoir System,” US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, 2003.
R. B. Jacobson and D. L. Galat, “Flow and Form in Rehabilitation of Large-River Ecosystems: An Example from the Lower Missouri River,” Geomorphology, Vol. 77, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 249-269. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.014
US Fish and Wildlife Service, “Letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers Describing a Clarified Definition of Shallow Water Habitat,” US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers, “Missouri River Recovery Program Project Implementation Report with Integrated Environmental Assessment and Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation. Jameson Island Unit Shallow Water Habitat Restoration Project on the US Fish & Wildlife Service’s Jameson Island Unit—Big Muddy National Fish & Wildlife Refuge,” US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC, 2012.
J. B. Brown, L. A. Sprague and J. A. Dupree, “Nutrient Sources and Transport in the Missouri River Basin, with Emphasis on the Effects of Irrigation and Reservoirs,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1034-1060. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00584.x
R. B. Jacobson, H. E. Johnson, M. S. Laustrup, G. J. D’Urso and J. M. Reuter, “Physical Habitat Dynamics in Four Side-Channel Chutes, Lower Missouri River,” US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1071, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, 2004.
US Environmental Protection Agency, “Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Discharge in Waters of the US—Test Manual: Inland Testing Manual. EPA-823-B-98-004, February 1998,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1998.
D. A. Beauchamp, D. H. Wahl and B. M. Johnson, “Pre- dator-Prey Interactions,” In: C. S. Guy and M. L. Brown, Eds., Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 2007, pp. 765-842.
E. H. Stanley and M. W. Doyle, “A Geomorphic Perspective on Nutrient Retention Following Dam Removal,” BioScience, Vol. 52, No. 8, 2002, pp. 693-701. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0693:AGPONR]2.0.CO;2
H. Ng, T. Mayaer and J. Marsalek, “Phosphorus Transport in Runoff from a Small Agricultural Watershed,” Water Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 3-5, 1993, pp. 451-460.
D. W. Blevins, D. Wilkison and S. Niesen, “Pre- and Post-Impoundment Nitrogen in the Lower Missouri River,” Hydrological Processes, in Press.
B. K. Woodward and D. L. Rus, “Characteristics of Suspended and Streambed Sediment Within Constructed Chutes and the Main Channel at Upper Hamburg and Glovers Point Bends, Missouri River, Nebraska, 2008,” US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1049, 2011.
R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwarz and R. B. Alexander, “Regional Interpretation of Water-Quality Monitoring Data,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 33, No. 12, 1997, pp. 2781-2798. doi:10.1029/97WR02171
R. B. Alexander, R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwarz, E. W. Boyer, J. V. Nolan and J. W. Brakebill, “Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 822-830. doi:10.1021/es0716103
R. A. Rebich, N. A. Houston, S. V. Mize, D. K. Pearson, P. B. Ging and C. E. Hornig, “Sources of Delivery of Nutrients to the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico from Streams in the South-Central United States,” Journal of the Ame- rican Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1061-1086. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00583.x
D. R. Wise and H. M. Johnson, “Surface-Water Nutrient Conditions and Sources in the United States Pacific Northwest,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1110-1135. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00580.x
R. B. Jacobson, D. W. Belvins and C. J. Bitner, “Sediment Regime Constraints on River Restoration—An Example from the Lower Missouri River,” In: L. A. James, S. L. Rathburn and G. R. Whittecar, Eds., Management and Restoration of Fluvial Systems with Broad Historical Changes and Human Impacts, Geological Society of America Special Papers 451, 2009, pp. 1-22. doi:10.1130/2009.2451(01)
J. W. Crites, Q. E. Phelps, K. N. S. McCain, D. P. Herzog and R. A. Hrabik, “An Investigation of Fish Community and Water Quality Compositions in an Isolated Side Channel of the Upper Missouri River,” Journal of Freshwater Ecology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012, pp. 19-29.
J. Barras, S. Beville, D. Britsch, S. Hartley, S. Hawes, J. Johnston, P. Kemp, Q. Kinler, A. Martucci, J. Porthouse, D. Reed, K. Roy, S. Saptoka and J. Suhayda, “Historic and Predicted Coastal Louisiana Land Changes: 1978-2050,” US Geological Survey Open File Report 03-334, National Wetlands Research Center, Baton Rouge, 2003.
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, “Gulf of Mexico Regional Ecosystem Restoration Strategy,” 2011, 119 p. http://www.epa.gov/gcertf/pdfs/GulfCoastReport_Full_12-04_508-1.pdf