Groundwater Vulnerability and Hazard Mapping in an Arid Region: Case Study, Amman-Zarqa Basin (AZB)-Jordan
- 1 Department of Applied Geology and Environment, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 2 Department of Land Management and Environment, The Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
- 3 Department of Land Management and Environment, The Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
- 4 Department of Applied Geology and Environment, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 5 Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hannover, Germany
Abstract
The importance of groundwater portability and the possible sources of anthropogenic contamination have led to the development of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability mapping. In this study, groundwater vulnerability map for Amman Zarqa Basin (AZB) has been generated based on information derived and calculated from processed remote sensing information and laboratory analysis. The database was prepared from soil hydro geological and hydrological data, Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and geological maps. For assessment of groundwater vulnerability, the method proposed by the state geological surveys of Germany (GLA-method) has been adapted and applied. The vulnerability map shows about 77% which is about 2919 Km 2 of the AZB is classified as very low to low which could be corresponding to the pollution sources due to the absence of potential hazards and also due to low vulnerabilities. These areas could consequently be interesting for future development as they set preferable in view of ground water protection. In addition, about 14% (530 km 2 ) is classified within the moderate vulnerability zone. About 5% (around 19 km 2 ) of the study area lies under the area of high vulnerability zone. Only 4% can be classified as very high risk areas. Groundwater quality results revealed that water leach ate from point source is the main cause for groundwater contaminations in highly vulnerable karstic limestone aquifer (Amman Wadi Es Sir Aquifer-B2/A7). On the other hand, the Kurnub Sandstone aquifer (K) is generally well protected in the central and eastern part of the AZB due to its thick cover of partly marly sequences. However, the Kurnub aquifer might have a potential risk from the recharged infiltrating surface water from the Zarqa River, which is highly polluted due to industrial activities located along the river.
- Sudhir, S., Srivastava, A., Pandey, A. and Gautam, S. (2013) Integrated Assessment of Groundwater Influenced by a Confluence River System: Concurrence with Remote Sensing and Geochemical Modelling. Water Resources Management, 27, 4291-4313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0408-y
- Wang, J., He, J. and Chen, H. (2012) Assessment of Groundwater Contamination Risk Using Hazard Quantification, a Modified DRASTIC Model and Groundwater Value, Beijing Plain, China. Science of the Total Environment, 432, 216-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.005
- Zwahlen, F. (2003) Vulnerability and Risk Mapping for the Protection of Carbonate (Karst) Aquifers. Final Report (COST Action 620). European Commission, Directorate-General XII Science, Research and Development, Brussels, 297.
- Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J.H. and Petty, R.J. (1985) DRASTIC: Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. US EPA, Oklahoma.
- Vrba, J. and Zoporozec, A. (1994) Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability. Vol. 16, IAH-International Contributions to Hydrogeology, Hannover, 131.
- Babiker, I.S., Mohamed, A., Hiyama, T. and Kato, K. (2005) A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Science of the Total Environment, 345, 127-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005
- Stigter, T.Y., Ribeiro, L. and Carvalho Dill, A.M.M. (2006) Evaluation of an Intrinsic and a Specific Vulnerability Assessment Method in Comparison with Groundwater Salinisation and Nitrate Contamination Levels in Two Agricultural Regions in the South of Portugal. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 79-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0396-3
- Hoelting, B., Haertlé, T., Hohberger, K., Nachtigall, K., Villinger, E., Weinzierl, W. and Wrobel, J. (1995) Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der Grundwasserüberdeckung. Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe C, 63, 5-24, Hannover.
- Gogu, R. and Dassargues, A. (2000) Current Trends and Future Challenges in Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Overlay and Index Methods. Environmental Geology, 39, 549-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002540050466
- Goldscheider, N. (2005) Karst Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: Application of a New Method in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 555-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-003-0291-3
- Mimi, Z. and Assi, A. (2009) Intrinsic Vulnerability, Hazard and Risk Mapping for Karst Aquifers: A Case Study. Journal of Hydrology, 364, 298-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.008