Implications of the New Operational Rules for Cantareira Water System: Re-Reading the 2014-2016 Water Crisis
- 1 Brazilian Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disaster-Cemaden, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 2 Brazilian Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disaster-Cemaden, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 3 Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (NHRI) under the Ministry of Water Resources, The Ministry of Transport and National Energy Administration, Nanjing, China
- 4 University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- 5 Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, Brazil
- 6 Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Sao Paulo, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 7 Sao Carlos School of Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, USP, Sao Carlos, Brazil
- 8 Brazilian Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disaster-Cemaden, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 9 Brazilian Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disaster-Cemaden, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 10 Brazilian Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disaster-Cemaden, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil
- 11 Center for Education & Research of Disasters of Sao Paulo, CEPED, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
During the 2014-2016 water shortage crisis, the Metropolitan Area of Sao Paulo (MASP) water supply system extracted pumping volume from the Cantareira System. Before the crisis, between 1984 and 2013, the reservoir’s average water extraction flow was 29.6 m 3 · s -1 . During the period of pumping volume usage, the average extraction flow was 16.2 m 3 · s -1 . Following the crisis, two new mitigation policies were implemented: a water extraction Resolution (in 2017) and a Resolution for water reallocation from another basin (in 2018). This study provides a novel investigation of the Cantareira System water crisis by assessing the mitigation policies impacts on storage level dynamics. The system storage level was evaluated using the reservoir simulation module of PDM-Cemaden hydrological model, assuming that the new policies had already been implemented prior to the crisis. A control simulation was run with observed in- and out-flow and operationally-practiced extraction flow. The storage level dynamics impacts were evaluated under 4 water mitigation policies scenarios varying the policies implementation starting date, the extraction flow range and including the water reallocation variable. Results showed that pumping volume would only need extraction during a short period (Scenarios I, III and IV), and considering the water reallocation, pumping volume extraction would not have been necessary (Scenario II). Although the pumping volume would still have been extracted during a short period, water shortage impact would have been lessened, had the policies been already implemented before the crisis. The water mitigation policies implementation supports the reservoirs storage management but does not guarantee that MASP water demand is fully met. Therefore, in order to effectively improve water security, further policies and practices to reduce water demand and enhance supply should be considered.
- Van Loon, A.F. (2015) Hydrological Drought Explained. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2, 359-392. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085
- Nobre, C.A., Marengo, J.A., Seluchi, M.E., Cuartas, A. and Alves, L.M. (2016) Some Characteristics and Impacts of the Drought and Water Crisis in Southeastern Brazil during 2014 and 2015. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.82022
- Coelho, C.A.S., de Oliveira, C.P., Ambrizzi, T., Reboita, M.S., Carpenedo, C.B., Campos, J.L.P.S., et al. (2016) The 2014 Southeast Brazil Austral Summer Drought: Regional Scale Mechanisms and Teleconnections. Climate Dynamics, 46, 3737-3752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2800-1
- Coelho, C.A.S., Cardoso, D.H.F. and Firpo, M.A.F. (2016) Precipitation Diagnostics of an Exceptionally Dry Event in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 125, 769-784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1540-9
- Millington, N. (2018) Producing Water Scarcity in Sao Paulo, Brazil: The 2014-2015 Water Crisis and the Binding Politics of Infrastructure. Political Geography, 65, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.04.007
- Otto, F.E.L., Coelho, C.A.S., King, A., de Perez, E.C., Wada, Y., van Oldenborgh, G.J., et al. (2015) Factors Other than Climate Change, Main Drivers of 2014/15 Water Shortage in Southeast Brazil. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96, S35-S40. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00120.1
- Dobrovolski, R. and Rattis, L. (2015) Water Collapse in Brazil: The Danger of Relying on What You Neglect. Natureza e Conservacao, 13, 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.03.006
- Hanbury, S. (2015) Brazil’s Worst Drought in History Prompts Protests and Blackouts. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/23/brazil-worst-drought-history
- Taffarello, D., Samprogna Mohor, G., do Carmo Calijuri, M. and Mendiondo, E.M. (2016) Field Investigations of the 2013-14 Drought through Quali-Quantitative Freshwater Monitoring at the Headwaters of the Cantareira System, Brazil. Water International, 41, 776-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1188352
- Cunha, A.P.M.A., Zeri, M., Deusdará Leal, K., Costa, L., Cuartas, L.A., Tomasella, J., et al. (2019) Extreme Drought Events over Brazil from 2011 to 2019. Atmosphere, 10, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110642
- Lund, J. and Medellín-Azuara, J. (2018) California: Water Security from Infrastructure, Institutions, and the Global Economy. In: Council, W.W., Ed., Global Water Security: Water Resources Development and Management, Springer, Singapore, 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7913-9_11