Behavioral and Technological Changes Regarding Lighting Consumptions: A MARKAL Case Study
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Abstract
The present study aims at assessing the joint impact of awareness campaigns and technology choice, on end-use energy consumption behaviour. Actions to achieve energy savings through the use of more energy efficient end-use technology are included. A new MARKAL framework, the Socio-MARKAL, was recently proposed by the authors. As opposed to the traditional MARKAL framework based on technical and economic considerations, the Socio-MARKAL concept integrates technological, economic and behavioural contributions to the environment. This study takes into consideration, technological improvements on the demand side by consumers as well as behavioural changes minimizing carbon dioxide emissions and encouraging rational use of energy. The study presented in this paper, “Lighting Consumptions Habits in Geneva Households”, was conducted from September to December 2009. Based on the statistical analysis of this survey, we have determined coefficients to feed the database of the Socio-MARKAL model (an IEA/ANSWER database is available for testing purposes).
- L. D. Hamilton, G. A. Goldstein, J. Lee, A. S. Manne, W. Mar-cuse and S. C. Morris, “MARKAL-MACRO: An Over- view,” BNL-48377, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Up- ton, 1992.
- E. Fragniere and A. Haurie, “A Stochastic Pro-gramming Model for Energy/Environment Choices under Un-certainty,” International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Vol. 6, No. 4-6, 1996, pp. 587-603.
- E. Fragnière, A. Haurie and R. Kanala, “A GIS-Based Re- gional En-ergy-Environment Policy Mode,” International Journal of Global Energy, Vol. 12, No. 1-6, 1999, pp. 159- 167.
- H. Turton and L. Barreto, “Long-Term Security of Energy Supply and Climate Change,” Energy Policy, Vol. 34, No. 15, 2006, pp. 2232-2250.
- H. Hondo and K. Baba, “Socio-Psychological Impacts of the Introduction of Energy Technologies: Change in Environmental Behaviour of Households with Photovoltaic Systems,” Applied Energy, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2010, pp. 229- 235.
- E. Fragniere, R. Kanala, D. Lavigne, F. Moresino, A. De Sousa, C. Cubizolle, C. Decurnex and G. Nguene, “Socio- Markal (Somarkal): First Modeling Attempts in the Nyon Res-idential and Commercial Sectors Taking into Account Behavioral Uncertainties,” 2009. http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1522143
- A. Rudin, “Why We Should Change Our Message and Goa l from “Use Energy Efficiently” to “Use Less Energy,” Proceedings of the ACEEE 2000 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Washington D.C., 2000, pp. 392-340.
- R. Hoevenagel, “An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Methods,” In: R. Pethig, Ed., Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994, pp. 195-227.
- G. Catenazzo and E. Fragniere, “La gestion des services,” Economica, Paris, 2008.
- S. Weber, A. Baranzini and E. Fragnière, “Consumers’ Choices among Alternative Electricity Programs in Geneva,” International Journal of Global Energy, Vol. 31, No. 3-4, 2009, pp. 295-309.
- G. Catenazzo, E. Fragniere, B. Ribordy and J. Tuberosa, “Is the 2008 Financial Turmoil Increasing the Risk of a Bank Run?” Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2010, pp. 29-45.
- R. Loulou, G. Goldstein and K. Noble, “MARKAL Users’ Guide: Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models,” Technical Report, 2004. http://www.etsap.org