Technological Change and Carbon Markets*
- 1
Abstract
In this brief note we discuss the innovation impacts of different market-based policy instruments in the climate field, and in particular the case of markets for carbon allowances. The note provides a brief review of the theoretical and empirical literature, and addresses important issues concerning policy instrument choice, the need for multiple policies as well as the timing and commitment strategies of the regulating agency. The analysis suggests that technological progress depends critically on developing and maintaining efficient carbon markets. In the case emissions are under-priced and/or adoption behaviour distorted by, for instance, inefficient plant entrants and closure provisions, any new carbon-free innovation will not be sufficiently exploited. However, for both economic and political reasons other policy instruments-most notably public R & D and technology support-will be needed to complement the price signals provided by carbon markets.
- R. Kemp and S. Pontoglio, “The Innovation Effects of Envi-ronmental Policy Instruments-A Typical Case of the Blind Men and the Elephant,” Paper for the DIME WP 2.5 Workshop on Empirical Analyses of Environmental Innovations, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, 2008.
- K. Ek and P. S?derholm, “Technology Learning in the Presence of Public R & D: The Case of European Wind Power,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, No. 12, 2010, pp. 2356-2362.
- A. D. Ellerman, “New Entrant and Closure Provisions: How Do They Distort?” The Energy Journal, Vol. 29, Special Issue, 2008, pp. 53-76.
- R. Kemp, “Environ-mental Policy and Technical Change. A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments,” Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1997.
- T. J. Foxon, J. K?hler and C. Oughton, “Innovation for a Low-Carbon Economy. Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches,” Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.
- T. Requate, “Dynamic Incentives by Environmental Policy-A Survey,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 54, No. 2-3, 2005, pp. 175-195.
- C. Fischer, I. W. H. Parry and W. A. Pizer, “Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2003, pp. 523-545.
- C. Fischer, “Climate Change Policy Choices and Technical Innovation,” Minerals & Energy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003, pp. 7-15.
- H. Vollebergh, “Impacts of Environmental Policy Instruments on Technological Change,” COM/ENV/EPO- C/CTPA/CFA(2006).36/FINAL, OECD, Paris, 2007.
- F. Gagelmann and M. Frondel, “The Impact of Emission Trading on Innovation-Science Fiction or Reaility?” European Environment, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2005, pp. 203- 211.
- D. Popp, “Pollution Control Innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2003, pp. 641-660.
- D. Burtraw, “Innovation under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emis-sion Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector,” Discussion Paper 00-38, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 2000.
- T. Sterner and B. Turnheim, “Innovation and Diffu-sion of Environmental Tech-nology: Industrial NOx Abatament in Sweden under Refunded Emission Payments,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 12, 2009, pp. 2996-3006.
- R. Sherman, “Market Regulation,” Addison-Wesley, New York, 2008.