Product Market Competition and Financial Flexibility: Evidence from China
- 1 School of Accountancy, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
- 2 School of Accountancy, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
- 3 Ningbo Municipal Development & Reform Commission, Ningbo, China
Abstract
This paper discusses the effects of product market competition on the value and level of corporate financial flexibility of Chinese listed firms for the period 2001-2014. We use three different measures of product market competition: predation risk, natural hedge and price-cost margin. Predation risk is used to measure how firms’ growth opportunities covary with those of their industry rivals. We thus calculate the correlation of firm stock returns with industry stock returns. The regression coefficient on the industry return is then used as the proxy for predation risk. Greater values of this measure indicate a greater predation risk, more interdependence of investment opportunities and therefore fiercer competition. Natural hedge is calculated as the absolute value of the difference between a firm’s ratio of net fixed assets per employee and the median ratio in the industry. To make this difference comparable across industries, the difference is then scaled by the industry range of the capital-to-labor ratio. Smaller values of this measure indicate greater similarity of a firm’s operations with industry counterparts and therefore signal fierce competition. The results show that when the other conditions remain unchanged, the predation risk weakens the spare debt capacity and excessive cash holdings and ultimately decreases corporate financial flexibility. Except for the natural hedge used to measure the degree of product market competition, which does not significantly affect spare debt capacity, the other results show that natural hedge reduces excessive cash holdings and corporate financial flexibility. On the one hand, product market competition increases the demand for financing; because Chinese listed firms are subjected to China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) supervision for issuing securities, they must increase debt and reduce their spare debt capacity. On the other hand, product market competition increases investment expenditure, consumes cash, and reduces excessive cash holdings. In the end, product market competition reduces corporate financial flexibility.
- Allen, F., Qian, J., Zhang, C., & Zhao, M. (2012). China’s Financial System: Opportunities and Challenges. NBER Working Paper No. 17828. http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~allenf/download/Vita/china%27s%20 financial%20system%20oct11.pdf https://doi.org/10.3386/w17828
- Arslan-Ayaydin, O., Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2014). Financial Flexibility, Corporate Investment and Performance: Evidence from Financial Crises. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-012-0340-x
- Bancel, F., & Mittoo, U. R. (2004). Cross-Country Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Survey of European Firms. Financial Management, 33, 103-132. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.683111
- Bolton, P., & Scharfstein, D. S. (1990). A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting. The American Economic Review, 80, 93-106.
- Brounen, D., De Jong, A., & Koedijk, K. (2006). Capital Structure Policies in Europe: Survey Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 1409-1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.02.010
- Clark, B. J. (2010). The Impact of Financial Flexibility on Capital Structure Decisions: Some Empirical Evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1499497
- DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Whited, T. M. (2011). Capital Structure Dynamics and Transitory Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.09.005
- Deb, P., David, P., & O’Brien, J. (2017). When Is Cash Good or Bad for Firm Performance? Strategic Management Journal, 38, 436-454. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2486
- Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0
- Fresard, L. (2010). Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings. The Journal of Finance, 65, 1097-1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01562.x
- Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 187-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00044-7
- Haushalter, D., Klasa, S., & Maxwell, W. F. (2007). The Influence of Product Market Dynamics on a Firm’s Cash Holdings and Hedging Behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 797-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.007