How Can Platform Leader Achieve Sustainable Development in Platform-Based Ecosystem?
- 1 School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, China
- 2 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Commercial competition paradigm is changing from competitive advantage which based internal resources to the eco-advantage which from ecosystem consisted of internal and external value network under the background of the Internet economy. Enterprises can’t effectively face the complex and fierce market competition environment which relied solely on internal heterogeneous resources or core competencies, so many firms adopt platform strategy and build a business ecosystem to be out of this dilemma. It could get eco-advantage for platform leaders to leverage the external resources and ability from the business ecosystem. How can platform leaders gain sustainable development depending on the superiority niche in the platform ecosystem? This paper will answer this question by taking JD as an example which is a typical B2C Internet platform. The results of the study are as follows: First, the platform firm is the leader and creator in the early establishment of the platform-based ecosystem, it’s the formational basis of eco-advantages comes from enough quantity and high quality of platform user. User install and demand are not only the important orientation s for platform enterprises producing and managing but also the power source for forming eco-advantages and sustainable development. Second, the sustainable development of the platform leader is related to the size and strength of the network effect. The more network effects, the more conducive to get eco-advantages and sustainable development for platform leaders. Third, the platform-based ecosystem is a value network consisted of a large number of network nodes which is a symbiosis relationship by competing and cooperating. The cross-border integration and collaborative development of multi-agent in the ecosystem are beneficial to promoting platform leaders to form ecological advantages and achieve sustainable development. Forth, platform leader, which is the leading species and key species determined the fate of species in the ecosystem, provides a place for value co-creation of multi-species. It is the process of multi-agent value co-creation based on the platform for platform leaders to obtain sustainable development, which is also the result of internal innovation and external open innovation. This study is of great significance to enrich the research of platform enterprise theory and guide the sustainable development of platform enterprise.
- Adner, R. (2002). When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 667-688. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.246
- Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 1, 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
- Barve, N., Barve, V., Jimenezvalverde, A., Liranoriega, A., Maher, S. P., Peterson, A. T., Villalobos, F. et al. (2011). The Crucial Role of the Accessible Area in Ecological Niche Modeling and Species Distribution Modeling. Ecological Modelling, 11, 1810-1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
- Bellamy, M. A., Ghosh, S., & Hora, M. (2014). The Influence of Supply Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 6, 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.004
- Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (1999). Cooperation and Competition in Relationships between Competitors in Business Networks. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 3, 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629910272184
- Benson, A. R., Gleich, D. F., & Leskovec, J. (2016). Higher-Order Organization of Complex Networks. Science, 6295, 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9029
- Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid Crowd Complementors: The Platform Network Effect Mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 1761-1777. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2324
- Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2016). Learning in Coopetition: Alliance Orientation, Network Size, and Firm Types. Journal of Business Research, 5, 1753-1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.050
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 4, 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
- Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform Envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 1270-1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935
- Enkel, E., & Heil, S. (2014). Preparing for Distant Collaboration: Antecedents to Potential Absorptive Capacity in Cross-industry Innovation. Technovation, 4, 242-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.010
- Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A Theory of Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
- Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3, 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105