Developed Countries Agricultural Subsidies and Cotton Production in Burkina Faso: An Analysis Using the Vector Autoregressive Model (VAR)
- 1 Faculté des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion (FSEG). Université Abdou Moumouni, Niamey, Niger
Abstract
For several years, cotton prices have been experiencing a sustained decline on the world market. For cotton-producing developing countries, this low price is the result of subsidies granted by developed countries, particularly the United States and the European Union to their producers. As a result, these developing countries expect substantial gains in trade and economic development once the subsidies are ended. This article aims to analyze the effect of U.S. and European subsidies on the production of Burkina Faso, one of Africa’s leading cotton exporters whose cotton sector is currently experiencing serious difficulties. The data used in this thesis are secondary data, drawn from existing databases or specialized journals and using an econometric model, the Vector Auto Regressive (VAR) model, the analysis shows that a negative and significant impact of subsidies on cotton production in Burkina Faso is highlighted. The consequences of the end of subsidies on the Burkinabe economy should be positive. Analysis by the VAR model through impulse response functions shows that U.S. and European subsidies negatively affect Burkina Faso’s cotton production and that these impacts do not occur directly but through the world price of cotton. Therefore, the State, cotton companies and producers, the three main actors in the sector, should see their situation improve simultaneously in the event of subsidy removal.
- Canova, F. (2003). Methods for Applied Research.
- Doan, T., Litterman, R., & Sims, C. (1984). Forecasting and Conditional Projection Using Realistic Prior Distributions. Econometric Reviews, 3, 1-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938408800053
- FAPRI (2002). The Doha Round of the World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization of Agricultural Markets. Working Paper 02-WP 317, Columbia, MI: Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Iowa State University and University of Missouri-Columbia.
- Fève, P. (2005). La modélisation macro-économétrique dynamique. Université de Toulouse (CNRS–GREMAQ et IDEI) et Banque de France (CRECH). http://www.banqueFrance.fr
- Goreux, L. (2003a). Les producteurs de coton des pays CFA face aux subventions américaines et européennes.
- Goreux, L. (2003b). Prejudice Caused by Industrialized Countries Subsidies to Cotton Sectors in Western and Central Africa. Genève: OMC.
- Goreux, L. (2003c). Reforming the Cotton Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa (2nd ed.). Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 62, Washington DC: World Bank.
- Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
- Leamer, L. (1972). The Paper Revolutionaries; the Rise of the Underground Press. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Litterman, R. B. (1980). A Bayesian Procedure for Forecasting with Vector Auto-Regression. Working Paper, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics.
- Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
- Nerlove, M. (1958). Estimate of Supply Elasticity: A Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 723-727. https://doi.org/10.2307/1235381
- ODI (2004). Understanding the Impact of Cotton Subsidies on Developing Countries and Poor People in Those Countries. London: ODI.
- Pan et al. (2004). The impact of U.S. Cotton Programs on the World Market : An analysis of Brazilian WTO Petition. Working paper, USA: Texas Tech University.
- Piggott, J., & Whalley, J. (1980). Welfare Loss Estimates from Homeowner Tax Preferences: Inflation, Mortgage Interest Deductibility, and Capital Gains Treatment. Economics Letters, 6, 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90010-5