Economic Governance Quality and Chinese OFDI: Evidence from the “Belt and Road” Countries
- 1 Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, School of Economics and Management, Beijing, China
- 2 Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, School of Economics and Management, Beijing, China
Abstract
China’s foreign direct investment in 54 countries along the “Belt and Road” from year 2003 to year 2019 are adopted as sample data, and economic system indicators such as business freedom, currency freedom, trade freedom, investment freedom, and fiscal freedom are introduced as the proxy variable for the quality of host-country’s economic governance, to analyze the impact of different economic governance levels of countries along the route on China’s foreign direct investment. Due to the missing data and the non-random characteristics of China’s investment in sample countries, the Heckman two-step model is adopted to solve the issue of self-selection bias, and policy impact of the “Belt and Road” initiative is introduced to explore the quality of economic governance of the countries along the route on China’s foreign direct invest ment. The findings show that, 1) China is more inclined to invest in host countries with a large market, and its investment preference is market-seeking; 2) the host-country labor freedom and financial freedom have a positive impact on Chinese direct investment, while trade freedom and investment freedom negatively affects Chinese investment; 3) the implementation of the “Belt and Road” initiative has affected the mechanism of host-country’s economic governance on China’s foreign direct investment.
- Blonigen, B. A. (2005). A Review of the Empirical Literature on FDI Determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33, 383-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-005-2868-9
- Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., et al. (2007). The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400277
- Cheung, Y. W., & Qian, X. (2009). Empirics of China’s Outward Direct Investment. Pacific Economic Review, 14, 312-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2009.00451.x
- Deng, M. (2012). Institutional Distance, “Demonstration Effect” and the Location Distribution of OFDI in China. International Trade Issues, 2, 123-135.
- Diego, Q. (2011). Enrique Claver. Laura Rienda. Political Risk, Cultural Distance and Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence from Large Chines Firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 4, 1-16.
- Jiang, G. H., Jiang, D. C. (2012). Location Selection of China’s Outward Investment: Panel Data Test Based on Investment Gravity Model. World Economy, 9, 21-40.
- Kang, Y. F., & Jiang, F. M. (2012). FDI Location Choice of Chinese Multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional Economic Factors and Institutional Perspective. Journal of World Business, 47, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.019
- Liu, X. N. (2018). Location Choice of Enterprises’ Direct Investment Abroad—Combined Investigation of Host Country Factors and Enterprise Heterogeneity Factors. Economic Survey, 35, 59-66.
- Pan, Z., & Jin, Z. K. (2015). Bilateral Political Relations, Host Country System Risk and China’s Foreign Direct Investment. Finance and Trade Economy, 6, 85-97.
- Wei, J. L., & Chen, L. G. (2009). The Impact of Political Risk on Chinese Companies Going Global—An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data Model. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, 96, 53-61.
- Zhang, J. F. (2013). Institutional Factors, Resource Seeking and Location Selection of China’s Foreign Direct Investment. Industrial Technology & Economy, 9, 56-62.
- Zhang, Y. H., Du, N. R., Li, Z. W., & Shi, Q. (2016). Research on the Impact of National Political Risk on My Country’S Foreign Direct Investment—Empirical Evidence from 112 Countries. Investment Research, 35, 19-30.
- Zhang, Y. R., & Fei, J. (2020). Bilateral Investment Agreements, Host Country Institutional Environment and China’s Outward Direct Investment Location Selection. Forum of World Economics and Politics, 6, 116-141.