Shipping: How a Low-Earnings Industry Has Created Very Rich Owners? The Stopford’s Paradox
- 1 Faculty of Maritime and Industrial Studies, Department of Maritime Studies, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece
- 2 Emeritus of Shipping, Transport and Logistics Department, Business College of Athens, Athens, Greece
Abstract
Most of the past research dealt mainly with freight rates . Here we dealt mainly with shipping earnings. A general opinion is that shipping industry is a risky one, and thus we mentioned the failure of Economics to define risk properly, which we did. We investigated also why shipowners insisted in earning 7.2% return on investment, while S + P 500 provided 14.1% (1975-200 1 ) . We showed that Maritime economists are stuck in the belief that the bigger the ship- and more volatile- the more profit…she provides. But maritime literature proved that the more you risk, the less you get in shipping businesses ! Our method is mainly statistical, and we showed that Stopford in 2009, proved that earnings from ships are leptokurtic in their distribution, with a fat RHS tail… Moreover, Stopford worked-out a model of a shipping company, which he called it “perfect”. We reviewed this, in 3 aspects, to see its perfection: investment, depreciation and dividend policy. We worked-out a comparison with “a hypothetical perfect Greek shipping company”. We also presented a new concept: “the customizable supply of ships” to indicate who gains the lot in shipping. Our main conclusion is that neither asset playing or chartering made certain shipowners millionaires like Onassis, but luck!
- Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M., & Schaefer, S. (2017). Economics of Strategy (7th ed.). Wiley Custom.
- Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Harvard University Press.
- Couper, A. (1998). Introduction. The Crisis Decades. Maritime Policy & Management, 25, 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000034
- Couper, A. D. (1999). Voyages of Abuse: Seafarers, Human Rights and International Shipping. Pluto Press.
- Glen, D. R., & Martin, B. T. (1998). Conditional Modelling of Tanker Market Risk Using Route Specific Freight Rates. Maritime Policy & Management, 25, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000023
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2009). Is History Repeated? Cycles and Recessions in Shipping Markets, 1929 and 2008. Shipping & Transport Logistics, 1, 329-360. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027679
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2021a). Why the Perfect Timing Achieved by the Managers of Shipping Companies Is So Important? Modern Economy, 12, 597-622. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.123031
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2021b). A Microeconomic (Vintage) Model of a Shipping Company: A Proposed Depreciation Strategy. Modern Economy, 12, 2152-7245. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.128062
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2021c). Managing Shipping Companies, the Way Their Pioneers Did: The Case-Studies of Vafias N Family and Aristotelis S Onassis. Modern Economy, 11, 2156-2182.
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2021d). Managing Shipping Companies, the Way Their Pioneers Do: The Case-Studies of Aristotelis S Onassis II and Angeliki Frangou. Modern Economy, 12, 247-273. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.121013
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2021e). Managing the Shipping Companies, the Way Their Pioneering Managers Did: The Case-Study of Stavros Niarchos. Modern Economy, 12, 1909-1996.
- Goulielmos, A. M. (2022). How a Company Could Benefit from the Volatility of Prices: The Shipping Industry as a Case Study. Modern Economy, 13, 977-1005. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2022.137052
- Grammenos, C. Th., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1996). A Cross-Section Analysis of Stock Returns: The Case of Shipping Firms. Maritime Policy & Management, 23, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839600000053
- Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1998). Beta Comparisons across Industries—A Water Transportation Industry Perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 25, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000027