Incentivizing Criteria for Steering the Implementation of Gas Distribution Investment Projects
- 1 Department of Business and Law, University of Milano, Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- 2 Department of Business and Law, University of Milano, Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Abstract
Natural gas distribution involves delivering gas to end customers via local low-pressure pipelines and is a public service. As part of the procedure for awarding the gas distribution service, contracting authorities define the scope of programmatic guidelines whereas firms participating in the open bidding process propose development plans through which they propose investment projects typically classified into extensions, upgrades, and maintenance development plans. According to the scale and scope of development plans, such investment projects must undergo, or are exempt from, a cost-benefit analysis. The criteria for classifying investment projects are called development conditions. This paper focuses on such criteria, proposing a new methodology aimed at incentivizing investment projects and simplifying the evaluation process. Results confirm that an improvement can be made in making development conditions more adequate to the needs of different territories. Policymakers can benefit from this paper, as investors and contracting authorities require a common methodology at the heart of the analysis of gas distribution network extension.
- Adedokun, O. A., Ibironke, O. T., & Babatunde, S. O. (2013). Assessment of Competitive Tendering Methods of Procuring Educational Building Projects in Nigeria. Journal of Facilities Management, 11, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961311301484
- ARERA (2018). Provisions for Consulting the Ten-Year Development Plans of the Natural Gas Transport Network and Approving the Minimum Requirements for the Preparation of the Plans and for the Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Interventions (468/ 2018/R/gas).
- ARERA (2019). Criteria for the Tariff Regulation of Gas Distribution and Metering Services in the Fifth Regulatory Period (DCO 410/2019/R7gas).
- Beccarello, M., & Di Foggia, G. (2022a). Economic Impact of Energy Efficiency Policies: A Scenario Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v14n12p1
- Beccarello, M., & Di Foggia, G. (2022b). Introducing a System Operator in the Waste Management Industry by Adapting Lessons from the Energy Sector. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, Article ID: 984721. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.984721
- Bergendorff, H., Larsson, T., & Näslund, R. (1983). The Monopoly v Competition Debate. Telecommunications Policy, 7, 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(83)90084-8
- Dorigoni, S., & Portatadino, S. (2009). Natural Gas Distribution in Italy: When Competition Does Not Help the Market. Utilities Policy, 17, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2009.03.001
- European Commission (2022). Services of General Economic Interest. EUR-lex. European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/services-of-general-economic-interest.html
- FiedZiuk, N. (2013). Putting Services of General Economic Interest Up for Tender: Reflections on Applicable EU Rules. Common Market Law Review, 50, 87-114. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2013005
- Gamper, C. D., & Turcanu, C. (2007). On the Governmental Use of Multi-Criteria Analysis. Ecological Economics, 62, 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.010
- Goncharuk, A. G. (2008). Performance Benchmarking in Gas Distribution Industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15, 548-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810903141
- Gullì, F. (2016). Investments Projects in Natural Gas Distribution in Italy: A Model of Social Cost-Benefit Analysis. Economics and Policy of Energy and Environment, 2016, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.3280/EFE2016-003001