A Kinetics-Based Approach to Production: Theory and Evidence
- 1 Department of Economics, Université Laval Québec, Québec, Canada
Abstract
Production theory has, over the course of the past two centuries, been besieged by criticism, ranging from its weak fundamentals to its lack of coherence with the physical sciences. Yet, no real alternatives have emerged with the result that neoclassical production theory continues to hold sway much as it did over the past century. This paper presents a consilient theory of production, one that is grounded in classical mechanics, is empirically validated, and sheds light on myriad productivity-related phenomena. Specifically, a two-tiered approach to modeling production is proposed. In the first tier, a kinetics-based theory is developed where output is an increasing function of energy consumption, in keeping with basic physics. In the second tier, the organization of energy-based material processes (the first tier) is modeled. The resulting model is estimated using U.S. manufacturing two-digit SIC data from 1947 to 1989.
- Alting, L. (1994). Chapter 1. A Morphological Process Model. In Manufa cturing Eng i neering Processes (pp. 1-47). Marcel Decker Inc.
- Beaudreau, B. C. (1995). The Impact of Electric Power on Productivity: The Case of U.S. Manufacturing 1958-1984. Energy Economics, 17, 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(95)00025-P
- Beaudreau, B. C. (1998). Energy and Organization: Growth and Distribut ion Reexa m ined . Greenwood Press.
- Beiser, A. (1983). Modern Technical Physics . The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
- Berndt, E., & Wood, D. (1975). Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 57, 259-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923910
- Chandler Jr., A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand, the Managerial Revolutio n in American Business . Harvard University Press.
- Cobb, C., & Douglas, P. (1928). A Theory of Production. American Econo mic Review, 18, 139-165.
- Committee on Factories Bill (1832). Parliamentary Papers, 1831-1832, V ol. XV .
- Devine, W. D. (1990). Electricity in Information Management: The Evolution of Electronic Control. In S. H. Schurr et al. (Eds.), Electricity in the American Economy (pp. 43-70). Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216186588.ch-002
- Ford, H. (1926). Mass Production. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 13, 821-823.
- Giraud, G., & Kahraman, Z. (2014). How Dependent Is Growth from Primar y Energy? Output Energy Elasticity in 50 Countries . Working Paper, Paris School of Economics.
- Jerome, H. (1934). Mechanization in Industry . National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Jevons, W. S. (1865). The Coal Question (Chapter 1). MacMillan and Co.
- Jorgenson, D. (1981). Energy Prices and Productivity Growth. Scandinav ian Journal of Economics, 83, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439894
- Jorgenson, D. (1984). The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth. Ameri can Economic Review, 74, 26-30.
- Kummel, R., Henn, J., & Lindenberger, D. (2002). Capital Labor, Energy and Productivity: Modeling Innovation Diffusion. Structural Change Economic Dynamics, 13, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(02)00008-5
- Kummel, R., Lindenberger, D., & Eichhorn, W. (2000). The Productive Power of Energy and Economic Evolution. Indian Journal of Applied Economics , 8, 231-262.