Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly Models with Complementary Goods
- 1
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper considers domestic (resp. international) Bertrand mixed duopoly competition in which a state-owned welfare-maximizing public firm and a domestic (resp. foreign) profit-maximizing private firm produce complementary goods. The main purpose of the paper is to present and to compare the equilibrium outcomes of the two mixed duopoly models.
KeywordsComplementary GoodsPrice CompetitionDomestic Mixed DuopolyInternational Mixed Duopoly
- F. Delbono and G. Rossini, “Competition Policy vs Horizontal Merger with Public, Entrepreneurial, and Labor-Managed Firms,” Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 1992, pp. 226-240.
- F. Delbono and V. Denicolò, “Regulating Innovative Activity: The Role of Public Firm,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1, March 1993, pp. 35-48.
- L. Nett, “Why Private Firms are More Innovative than Public Firms,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 4, December 1994, pp. 639-653.
- J. Willner, “Welfare Maximization with Endogenous Average Costs,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 12, No. 3, September 1994, pp. 373-386.
- K. Fjell and D. Pal, “A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, No. 3, August 1996, pp. 737-743.
- K. George and M. La Manna, “Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership,” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 11, No. 6, December 1996, pp. 853-860.
- M. D. White, “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization,” Economics Letters, Vol. 53, No. 2, November 1996, pp. 189-195.
- S. Mujumdar and D. Pal, “Effects of Indirect Taxation in a Mixed Oligopoly,” Economics Letters, Vol. 58, No. 2, February 1998, pp. 199-204.
- D. Pal, “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly,” Economics Letters, Vol. 61, No. 2, November 1998, pp. 181-185.
- D. Pal and M. D. White, “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 65, No. 2, April 1998, pp. 264-281.
- J. Poyago-Theotoky, “R&D Competition in a Mixed Duopoly Under Uncertainty and Easy Imitation,” Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 26, No. 3, September 1998, pp. 415-428.
- K. Fjell and J. S. Heywood, “Public Stackelberg Leadership in a Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Firms,” Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 41, No. 3, September 2002, pp. 267-281.
- T. Matsumura, “Stackelberg Mixed Duopoly with a Foreign Competitor,” Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 55, No. 3, July 2003, pp. 275-287.
- L. Han and H. Ogawa, “Economic Integration and Strategic Privatization in an International Mixed Oligopoly,” FinanzArchiv, Vol. 64, No. 3, September 2008, pp. 352- 363.
- K. Ohnishi, “International Mixed Duopoly and Strategic Commitments,” International Economics and Economic Policy, Vol. 4, No. 4, February 2008, pp. 421-432.