This paper suggests that understanding questions such as those related to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) requires economic theorizing to include in its explanatory models the very fact that (economic) agents have their own distinctive conception of how reality ought to be (which implies making judgments of value). Under standard economic theorizing, the relationship between social or ethical values and economics is one of mere juxtaposition. Ethical and economic issues are being put together side by side in such a way that the anomalies pointed out by economics, which refer to the presence of goal paradoxes and the problem of altruism, etc., denote the presence of ethical issues within the processes of valuation and choice by agents. To surpass this relationship a change of perspective by means of the agents’ action plans approach is proposed. The action plan approach allows to pass from a conception of economics understood as a technology-of-choice to economics understood as a theory of production-of-action. In particular, it is shown that the ethical dynamics of agents are capable of generating “ethical novelties’, which consequently alter the agents’ space of goals. Insofar as this is heavily influenced by CSR, the consequence is that CSR is neither strange to Economics nor a concept juxtaposed with the analysis of autonomous economic processes.
KeywordsCorporate Social ResponsibilityEconomicsEthicsAgent Action PlanIntentionality
M. I. Encinar, J. L. Cendejas and F. F. Mu?oz, “On the relationship between Ethics and Economics,” Cuadernos de Economía, Vol. 29, No. 76, 2006, pp. 93-118.
F. Weyzig, “Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the CSR Agenda,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2009, pp. 417-428. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9855-4
R. R. Nelson, “Evolutionary Social Science and Universal Darwinism,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2006, pp. 491-510. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0025-5
R. R. Nelson, “Bounded Rationality, Cognitive Maps, and Trial and Error Learning,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2008, pp. 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.002
G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, “The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
R. N. Langlois, “The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy,” Rout- ledge, London, 2006.
KPMG, “KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008,” 2008. http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/article spublications/pages/sustainability-corporate-responsibility- reporting-2008.aspx
A. Lindgreen, V. Swaen and F. Maon, “Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 85, Suppl. 2, 2009, pp. 251-256. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9732-1
D. B. Bielak, S. M. J. Bonini and J. M. Oppenheim “CEOs on Strategy and Social Issues,” The McKinsey Quarterly, 2007, pp. 1-8 (accessed 20 July 2010). http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/CEOs_on_strategy_and_social_issues_2056
A. B. Carroll, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business and Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1999, pp. 268-299. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303
A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2001, pp. 117-127.
CEC, “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Green Paper,” 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/greenpaper_en.pdf
A. K. Sen, “Internal Consistency of Choice,” Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1993, pp. 495-521. doi:10.2307/2951715
S. Zamagni, Ed., “The Economics of Altruism. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics,” Ed- ward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1995.
A. K. Sen, “On Ethics and Economics,” Blackwell, Oxford, 1987.
C. Ca?ibano, M. I. Encinar and F. F. Mu?oz, “Evolving Capabilities and Innovative Intentionality: Some Reflections on the Role of Intention within Innovation Processes,” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, Vol. 8, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 310-321.
G. S. L. Shackle, “Epistemics and Economics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972.
S. Ghoshal, “Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2005, pp. 75-91. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, No. 12, 2002, pp. 56-58.
M. C. Jensen, “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,” Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2003, pp. 235-256. doi:10.2307/3857812
M. Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, pp. 32-33.
R. C. Solomon, “Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics,” Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1992, pp. 317-339. doi:10.2307/3857536
J. M. Keynes, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,” MacMillan, London, 1936.
J. R. Hicks, “Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory,” Clarendon Paperbacks, Oxford, 1939.
G. Debreu, “Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium,” Yale University Press, New Haven, 1959.
K. Boulding, “What Is Evolutionary Economics?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1991, pp. 9-17. doi:10.1007/BF01202334
L. Lachmann, “Vicissitudes of Subjectivism and the Dilemma of the Theory of Choice. Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions,” In: D. Lavoie, Ed., Essays in Economics by Ludwig Lachmann, Routledge, London and New York, 1994, pp. 218-228.
J. S. Metcalfe, “The Entrepreneur and the Style of Modern Economics,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, 2004, pp. 157-175. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0210-3
K. Dopfer, J. Foster and J. Potts, “Micro-Meso-Macro,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2004, pp. 263-279. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0
J. R. Searle, “Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173452
J. R. Searle, “Rationality in Action,” The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.
F. F. Mu?oz, M. I. Encinar and C. Ca?ibano, “On the Role of Intentionality in Evolutionary Economic Change,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2011, pp. 193-203. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2011.04.002
B. J. Loasby, “Imagination and Order,” The DRUID Summer Conference 2007 on Appropriability, Proximity, Routines and Innovation, Copenhagen, 18-20 June 2007. http://www.druid.dk.
M. I. Encinar and F. F. Mu?oz, “On Novelty and Economics: Schumpeter’s Paradox,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2006, pp. 255-277. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0018-4
R. Rubio de Urquía, “Una Introducción Sistemática al Tema Economía y Responsabilidad Social,” In: P. Giménez, C. de la Calle and L. Climent, Eds., Persona y Sociedad. Las dos Caras del Compromiso, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria & Cátedra de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa del Grupo Santander, Madrid, 2007, pp. 25-65.
L. Robbins, “An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science,” Macmillan, London, 1932.
F. Knight, “Risk, Uncertainty and Profit,” Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1921.
L. Mises, “Human Action: A Treatise on Economics,” Hodge, London, 1949.
B. J. Loasby, “Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics,” Routledge, London, 1999. doi:10.4324/9780203459096
C. Ca?ibano, M. I. Encinar and F. F. Mu?oz, “Ethical Novelty: new insights into economic change,” 2006.
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/uamwpaper/200603.htm M. Yunus, “Vers un Monde sans Pauvreté,” Jean-Claude Lattès, Paris, 1997.