Governance and Poverty Reduction in Thailand
- 1 Graduate School of Development Economics, National Institute of Development Administration
Abstract
The objective of this study is to find out how Thailand achieves her economic growth along with poverty reduction without good governance practice. The relationships among economic growth, poverty indicators and governance indi- cators are computed by using Pearson’s correlation. The computed results show that the poverty reduction in Thailand is achieved through populist policies which are exercised with low quality of governance, not through growth. It sup- ports general belief that the “pro-poor growth” policy alone without good governance performance is insufficient for enhancing poverty reduction equally. A strategy for reducing poverty and income inequality for Thailand is not to en- hance economic growth but to promote major improvements in governance especially in variable that reflect the per- ception in three governance composite indicators namely Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence, and Rule of Law.
- N. Girishankar, L. Hammergren, M. Holmes, et al., “Go- ver-nance and Poverty Reduction,” Draft for Comments within the World Bank and from Comments Provided at PRSP Workshops, April 2001, p. 2.
- M. G. Martin, (2006) “Governance and Poverty Reduc- tion: Paths of Connection,” Trocaire Develop-ment Re- view, Dubin, p. 35.
- D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi, “The World- wide Governance Indicators, Me-thodology and Analytical Issues,” Policy Research Working Paper 5430 for the World Bank Development Research Group, Macroeco- nomics and Growth Team, September 2010.
- M. Krongkaew, S. Chamnivickorn and I. Nitithanprapas, “Economic Growth, Employment, and Poverty Reduction linkages: The Case of Thailand,” Issues in Employment and Poverty Discussion Paper 20, January 2006, pp. 27- 30.
- E. Chan-lett-Avery, “Political Turmoil in Thailand and US Interests,” CRS Report for Congress, Prepared for Mem- bers and Com-mittees of Congress, 26 May 2009, pp. 1-5.
- Asian Devel-opment Bank, “ADB Annual Report,” ISSN 306-8370 (print), April 2000.
- National Economic and Social Development Board, “Good Governance Strategies,” Thailand’s 9th National Economic and Social Development Plan 2002-2006, Chapter 2, 2002.
- B. Dressel, “Strengthening Governance through Constitu- tional Reform, The Governance Brief (ADB),” A Quar- terly Publication Capacity Development and Governance Division Regional and Sustainable Development Depart- ment, No. 13, 2005.
- D. Thandee, “Good Governance in Thailand: Limitations and Challenges,” Proceedings of the Seminar on Good Governance, Economy, Education, Culture and Tourism of Thailand and Korea, The Institute of East Asian Stud- ies of Thammasat University, Khlong Nueng, 10-11 Feb- ruary 2010, pp. 14-18.
- National Economic and Social Development Board, “Thailand’s 9th National Economic and Social Develop- ment Plan 2002-2006,” Chapter 2, and “Thailand’s 10th National Economic and Social Development Plan 2007- 2011,” Chapters 1 and 6.
- S. Maisrikrod, “Civil Society, Accountability and Gov- ernance in Thailand: A Dim Case of Participatory De- mocracy,” Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008, pp. 97-98,
- P. Phongpaichit, “Good Governance: Thailand’s Experi- ence,” Paper for Asia Pacific Finance Association (APFA) Annual Conference, July 2001.
- D. Thandee, “Good Governance in Thailand: Limitations and Challenges,” op.cit., pp. 15-16.