Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Carbon Emission Allocation and Efficiency of EU Countries
Department of Banking and Finance, Kainan University, Taiwan, China
- 1 Department of Banking and Finance, Kainan University, Taiwan, China
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Reduction of CO2 emissions is increasingly important among countries that want to protect the environment against global warming and climate change. This study examines two methods of CO2 emission reduction—CO2 emission allowance and an international agreement—by applying the Zero Sum Gains Model and the Cooperation and Alliance Model. We conclude that all DMUs reach 100% efficiency after trading on the CO2 emission allowance. The international agreement also improves the average efficiency of all DMUs, but its effect is inferior to the trading of the CO2 emission allowance.
KeywordsCO2 Emission AllowanceInternational Agreement
- J. P. M. Sijm, M. M. Beck, M. G. J. den Elzen and R. A. van den Wijnggarrt, “Options for Post-2012 EU Burden Sharing and EU ETS Allocation,” Netherlands Environ- mental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, 2007.
- A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-making Units,” European Jour- nal of Operational Research Vol. 2, No. 6, 1978, pp. 429- 444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- H. Dyckhoff and K. Allen, “Measuring Ecological Effi- ciency with Data Envelop-ment Analysis (DEA),” Euro- pean Journal of Operational Research Vol. 132, No. 2, 2001, pp. 312-325. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00154-5
- T. C. Koopmans, “An Analysis of Production as an Effi- cient Combination of Activities,” In: T. C. Koopmans, Ed., Activity Analysis of Pro-duction and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Wiley, New York, Monograph No. 13, 1951.
- H. Scheel, “Undesirable Outputs in Efficiency Evalua- tions,” Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2001, pp. 400-410. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
- B. Golany and Y. Roll, “An Application Procedure for DEA,” Omega the Inter-national Journal of Management Science Vol. 17, No. 3, 1989, pp. 237-250. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7
- C. A. K. Lovell, J. T. Pastor and J. A. Turner, “Measuring Macroeconomic Perfor-mance in the OECD: A Compari- son of European and Non-European Countries,” Euro- pean Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 87, No. 3, 1995, 507-518. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00226-X
- S. Rheinhard, C. A. K. Lovell and G. Thijssen, “Econo- metric Estimation of Tech-nical and Environmental Effi- ciency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 81, No. 1, 1999, pp. 44-60. doi:10.2307/1244449
- J. Sarkis and J. J. Cordeiro, “An Empirical Evaluation of Envi-ronmental Efficiencies and Firm Performance: Pollu- tion Pre-vention versus End-of-pipe Practice,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 135, No. 1, 2001, pp. 102-113. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00306-4
- E. G. Gomes and M. E. P. Lins, “Modelling Undesirable Outputs with Zero Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analy- sis Models,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 59, 5, 2008, pp. 616-623. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602384
- M. Coli, E. Nissi and A. Rapposelli, “Monitoring Envi- ronmental Efficiency: An Application to Italian Prov- inces,” Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2011, pp. 38-43. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.004