Are Foreign and Public Investment Spending Productive in the Argentine Case? A Single Break Unit Root and Cointegration Analysis, 1960-2010. — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Are Foreign and Public Investment Spending Productive in the Argentine Case? A Single Break Unit Root and Cointegration Analysis, 1960-2010.
Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, USA
1 Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, USA
This paper addresses the important question of whether public investment spending and inward foreign direct investment (FDI) flows enhance economic growth and labor productivity in Argentina. The paper estimates a dynamic labor productivity function for the 1960-2010 period that incorporates the impact of public and private investment spending, the labor force, and export growth. Single break (Zivot-Andrews) unit root and cointegration analysis suggest that (lagged) increases in public investment spending on economic and social infrastructure have a positive and significant effect on the rate of labor productivity growth. In addition, the model is estimated for a shorter period (1970-2010) to capture the impact of inward FDI flows. The estimates suggest that (lagged) inward FDI flows have a positive and significant impact on labor productivity growth, while increases in the labor force have a negative effect. From a policy standpoint, the findings call into question the politically expedient policy in many Latin American countries, including Argentina during the 1990s and early 2000s, of disproportionately reducing public capital expenditures to meet reducetions in the fiscal deficit as a proportion of GDP. The results give further support to progrowth policies designed to promote public investment spending and attract inward FDI flows.
KeywordsArgentinaComplemetarity HypothesisEndogenous GrowthForeign Direct InvestmentLabor Productivity GrowthPublic InvestmentZivot-Andrews Unit Root Tests
B. Werner, P. Elosegui and A. Gallo, “The Achievements and Failures of Argentina’s Neo-Liberal Economic Policies,” Working Paper, University of Illinois, Urbana, 2002.
M. Weisbrot, A. Cibils and D. Kar, “Argentina Since Default: The IMF and the Depression,” Briefing Paper, Center for Economic and Policy Research, 2002, pp. 1- 25.
United Nations, “World Investment Report, 2007,” United Nations, Geneva, 2007.
ECLAC, “Statistical Yearbook for Latin American and the Caribbean,” United Nations, Santiago, 2010.
J. L. Calva, “Market and the State in the Mexican Economy: A Retrospective and Future Trends,” Challenges of Economic Development, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 71-102.
J. L. Maitan and M. Keitel, “Argentina: Sustainable Output Growth after the Collapse,” Working Paper, Buenos Aires: Direccion Nacional de Politicas Macroeconomicas, Ministerio de Economia, 2003.
J. Stiglitz, “Whither Reform? Towards a New Agenda for Latin America,” Cepal Review, Vol. 80, 2003, pp. 7-38.
M. Pastor, “Current Account Deficits and Debt Accumulation in Latin America Debate and Evidence,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1989, pp. 77-97. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(89)90032-1
L. Taylor, “The Revival of the Liberal Creed—The IMF and the World Bank in Globalized Economy,” World Development, Vol. 25, 1997, pp. 145-152. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00117-9
M. Weisbrot and L. Sandoval, “Argentina’s Economic Recovery: Policy Choices and Implications,” Briefing Paper, Center for Economic and Policy Research, 2007, pp. 1-20.
J. M. Albala-Bertrand and E. C. Mamatzakis, “Is Public Infrastructure Productive? Evidence from Chile,” Applied Economic Letters, Vol. 8, 2001, pp. 195-199. doi:10.1080/13504850150504595
E. Cardoso, “Private Investment in Latin America,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1993, pp. 833-848. doi:10.1086/452050
R. Ram, “Productivity of Public and Private Investment in Developing Countries: A Broad International Perspective,” World Development, Vol. 24, No. 8, 1996, pp. 1373- 1378. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00036-8
M. D. Ramirez, “Does Public Investment Enhance Productivity Growth in Mexico? A Cointegration Analysis,” Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1998, pp. 63- 82.
T. Killick, “IMF Programmes in Developing Countries,” Routledge, London, 1995. doi:10.4324/9780203400357
M. Weisbrot, “The Argentine Success Story and Its Implications,” Briefing Paper, Center for Economic Policy and Research, 2011, pp. 1-23.
L. R. De Mello Jr., “Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: A Selective Survey,” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-34. doi:10.1080/00220389708422501
C. I. Jones, “Introduction to Economic Growth,” W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, 1998.
J. Green and D. Villanueva, “Private Investment in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1991, pp. 33-58. doi:10.2307/3867034
A. Lin and Y. Steven,. “Government Spending and Economic Growth,” Applied Economics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1994, pp. 83-85. doi:10.1080/00036849400000064
W. Roberts and J. Alexander, “The Investment-Output Ratio in Growth Regressions,” Applied Economic Letters, Vol. 1, No. 5, 1994, pp. 74-76. doi:10.1080/135048594358177
R. Ram and K. H. Zhang, “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross Country Data for the 1990s,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2002, pp. 205-215. doi:10.1086/345453
S. S. Everhart and M. A. Sumlinski, “Trends in Private Investment Spending in Developing Countries: Statistics for 1970-2000,” Working Paper No. 44, The World Bank, International Finance Corporation, Washington, 2001.
R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger, “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1987, pp. 251-276. doi:10.2307/1913236
C. W. J. Granger and P. Newbold, “Spurious Regression in Econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1974, pp. 111-120. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7
W. W. Charemza and D. F. Deadman, “New Directions in Econometric Practice: General to Specific Modelling, Cointegration and Vector Autoregression,” Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, 1997.
M. Bahmani-Oskooee, “Decline in the Iranian Rial during the Post-Revolutionary Period: A Productivity Approach,” Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1996, pp. 477-492.
C. S. Hakkio and M. Rush, “Cointegration: How Short Is the Long Run?” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1991, pp. 571-581. doi:10.1016/0261-5606(91)90008-8
E. Zivot and D. Andrews, “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, 1992, pp. 251-252.
M. Waheed, A. Tasneen and G. Saghir, “Structural Breaks and Unit Roots: Evidence from Pakistani Macroeconomic Time Series,” Paper No. 1797, Munich Personal RePec Archive, 2006, pp. 1-18.
A. Sen, “On Unit Root Tests when the Alternative Is a Trend Break Stationary Process,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 21, No.1, 2003, pp. 174-184. doi:10.1198/073500102288618874
J. Lee and M. C. Strazicich, “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 85, No. 4, 2003, pp. 1082-1089. doi:10.1162/003465303772815961
S. Johansen and K. Juselius, “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1990, pp. 169-210. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
R. Harris, “Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling,” Prentice-Hall, New York, 1995.