A model of circumstances that can lead to changes in the way a fiscal authority conducts policy after joining a monetary union is presented and empirically tested for the euro area. According to the model consolidation fatigue, shock asymmetry, or differences in the relative weight placed on output/price stabilization between the new and old monetary authority can lead to greater reliance on fiscal policy. Empirical evidence suggests that there has been a change in the conduct of fiscal policy in the euro area which is most likely due to consolidation fatigue and a stronger emphasis on price stabilization by the European Central Bank.
KeywordsFiscal PolicyPolicy InteractionEMU
H. Uhlig, “One Money, But Many Fiscal Policies in Europe: What are the Consequences,” CEPR Discussion Papers No. 3296, 2002.
A. H. Hallett and J. Lewis, “European Fiscal Discipline Before and After EMU: Crash Diet or Permanent Weight Loss,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2008, pp. 404-424.
P. Benigno, “Optimal Monetary Policy in a Currency Area,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2004, pp. 293-320. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00055-2.
R. Beetsma and H. Jensen, “Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in a Micro-founded Model of a Monetary Union,” Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2005, pp. 357-376. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2003.11.017.
J. Gali and T. Monacelli, “Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Currency Union,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2008, pp. 116-132.
T. Michalak, J. Engwerda and J. Plasmans, “Strategic Interactions between Fiscal and Monetary Authorities in a Multi-Country New-Keynesian Model of a Monetary Union,” CESifo Working Paper, No. 2534, 2009.
A. Dixit and L. Lambertini, “Monetary-Fiscal Policy Interaction and Commitment versus Discretion in a Monetary Union,” European Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 4-6, 2001, pp. 977-987. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00134-9.
A. Dixit and L. Lambertini, “Symbiosis of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in a Monetary Union,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2003, pp. 235-247. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00048-X.
R. Beetsma, X. Debrun and F. Klaassen, “Is Fiscal Policy Coordination in EMU Desirable,” CESifo Working Papers, No. 599, 2001.
B. Van Aarle, H. Garretsen and F. Huart, “Monetary and Fiscal Policy Rules in the EMU,” German Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2004, pp. 407-434. doi:10.1111/j.1465-6485.2004.00115.x.
P. Bofinger and E. Mayer, “Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interaction in the Euro Area with Different Assumptions on the Phillips Curve,” Open Economy Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007, pp. 291-305. doi:10.1007/s11079-007-9039-3.
R. Beetsma and A. Bovenberg, “Monetary Union without Fiscal Coordination may Discipline Policymakers,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1998, pp. 239-258. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00031-2
R. Mundell, “A Theory of Optimal Currency Area,” American Economic Review, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1961, pp. 657-665.
C. Wyplosz, “European Monetary Union: The Dark Side of Major Success,” Economic Policy, Vol. 21, No. 46, 2006, pp. 207-261.
B. Eichengreen and C. Wyplosz, “The Stability Pact: More than a Minor Nuisance,” Economic Policy, Vol. 13, No. 26, 1998, pp. 65-113.
J. Gali and R. Perotti, “Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe,” Economic Policy, Vol. 18, No. 37, 2003, pp. 533-572.
A. García, M. Arroyo, R. Minguez and J. Uxó, “Estimation of a Fiscal Policy Rule for EMU Countries,” Applied Economics, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2009, pp. 869-884.
J. Von Hagen, “Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Performance in the EU and Japan,” GESY Discussion Paper, No. 147, 2006.
F. Balassone, M. Francese and S. Zotteri, “Cyclical Asym- metry in Fiscal Variables in the EU,” Empirica, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2010, pp. 381-402. doi:10.1007/s10663-009-9114-7
B. Candelon, J. Muysken and R. Vermeulen, “Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe: An Update,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2010, pp. 323- 349. doi:10.1093/oep/gpp017
M. Strawczynski and J. Zeira, “Cyclicality of Fiscal Policy: Permanent and Transitory Shocks,” CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP271, 2009.
O. Blanchard and D. Quah, “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances,” American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 4, 1989, pp. 655-673.
T. Bayoumi and B. Eichengreen, “Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Unification,” NBER Working Papers, No. 3949, 1992.
J. Fidrmuc and I. Korhonen, “Similarity of Supply and Demand Shocks between the Euro Area and the CEECs,” Economic Systems, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2003, pp. 313-336. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2003.05.002
J. Babetski, L. Boone and M. Maurel, “Exchange Rate Regimes and Supply Shock Asymmetry: The Case of the Accession Countries,” Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.32, No. 2, 2004, pp. 212-229.
M. Arellano and S. R. Bond, “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, No. 194, 1991, pp. 277-297. doi:10.2307/2297968
V. Chari, P. Kehoe and E. McGrattan, “Are Structural VaRs with Long-Run Restrictions Useful in Developing Business Cycle Theory,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 55, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1337-1352. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.09.010
F. Windmeijer, “A Finite Sample Correction of the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-step GMM Estimators,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 53, 2005, pp. S121-S169.
J. De Haan, R. Inklaar and R. Jong-a-Pin, “Will Business Cycles in the Euro Area Converge? A Critical Survey of Empirical Research,” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 234-273.
T. Clark and E. van Wincoop, “Borders and Business Cycles,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2001, pp. 59-85.
J. Frankel and A. Rose, “The Endogeneity of the Optimal Currency Area Criteria,” Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 449, 1998, pp. 1009-1025. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00327