Housing Choice in an Affluent Shanghai – Decision Process of Middle Class Shanghai Residents
- 1
Abstract
While most papers on housing choice concentrate on relatively disadvantaged groups in the society con-strained by financial ability, this paper looks at the affluent population in Shanghai. In examining their own perception of the relative importance of difference factors affecting such choice by way of an Analytical Hi-erarchy Process, we are able to understand that currently, most affluent households still regard proximity to the city centre as an important factor when making housing choice. More importantly, there seems to be a marked difference in the ranking of these factors between the upper middle class and the average middle class in this city. Our analysis shows that the upper middle class households place more importance on the transportation network and neighbourhood infrastructure, while the average middle class have more concern on the housing attributes.
- W. A. V. Clark and A. M. C. Deurloo, “Aging in Place and Housing Over-Consumption,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Dordrecht, September 2006, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 315-335.
- N. Denton, “The Geography of Opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America,” Contem-porary Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 2, March 2007, pp. 135-136. doi:10.1177/009430610603600210
- K. E. Lahey, M. L. Newman and D. Kim, “Housing Choices and Mortgage Fi-nancing Options for Seniors,” Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, May- ugust 2006, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 103-119.
- T.Y. Owusu, “Residential Patterns and Housing Choices of Ghanaian Immigrants in Toronto, Canada,” Housing Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1999, p. 77-98. doi:10.1080/02673039983019
- C. Jones, C. Leishman and C. Watkins, “Intra-Urban Migration and Housing Submarkets: Theory and Evidence,” Housing Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 269- 283. doi:10.1080/0267303032000168630
- M. Consuelo Colom and M. Cruz Molés, “Comparative Analysis of the Social, Demographic and Economic Factors that Influ-enced Housing Choices in Spain in 1990 and 2000,” Urban Studies, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008, pp. 917-941. doi:10.1177/0042098007088474
- M. J. Sirgy, S. Grzeskowiak and C. Su, “Explaining Housing Preference and Choice: The Role of Self-Congruity and Functional Congru-ity,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2005, pp. 329- 347. doi:10.1007/s10901-005-9020-7
- S. M. Li and Y. M. Siu, “Residential Mobility and Urban Restructuring under Market Transition: Study of Guangzhou, China,” Professional Geog-rapher, May 2001, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 219-229. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00281
- S. Li, “Housing Tenure and Residential Mobility in Urban China: A Study of Com-modity Housing Development in Beijing and Guangzhou,” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2003, pp. 510-534. doi:10.1177/1078087402250360
- W. P. Wu, “Migrant Intra-Urban Residential Mobility in Urban China,” Housing Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2006, pp. 745-765. doi:10.1080/02673030600807506
- S. Q. Zheng, Y. M. Fu and H. Y. Liu, “Housing-Choice Hindrances and Urban Spatial Structure: Evidence from Matched Location and Loca-tion-Preference Data in Chinese Cities,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2006, pp. 535-557. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.05.003
- M. Liu, R. Reed and H. Wu, “Challenges Facing Housing Affordability in Beijing in the Twenty-First Century,” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2008, pp. 275-287. doi:10.1108/17538270810895114