Research on the Influence of the Characteristics of Independent Director to the Quality of Internal Control Self-Assessment Report
- 1 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
This article selects the empirical data from Shanghai A share, using multiple linear regression model to discuss the impact to the quality of the internal control self-assessment report from four aspects of the characteristic of the independent directors. The conclusions are that the number of independent directors, the independent directors’ proportion and the auditing professional background of independent directors are positively correlated with the quality of internal control self-assessment report, and the age of the independent directors, the independent directors’ reward and the location consistency of the independent directors and the company are negatively correlated with the quality of internal control self-assessment report. Finally, this paper gives four suggestions.
- Ashbaugh, S., et al. (1996) Evaluating Internal Control Deficiencies. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 4, 443-465.
- Beasley, M.S. (2009) An Empirical Analysis of Relation between Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 4, 129-133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248566?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
- COSO (1992) Internal Control-Integrated Framework. COSO, American.
- COSO (2004) Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework. COSO, American.
- Daily, C. and Dalton, D. (1993) Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 55-64.
- Duffy, M.N. (2004) Section 404 Opens a Door. Journal of Accountancy, 197, 55-64. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-118443312/section-404-opens-a-door-the- requirement-to-evaluate
- Eng, L. and Mak, Y. (2003) Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325-345. http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/5180/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1
- Eisenhardt, K. (1989) Agency theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74. http://amr.aom.org/content/14/1/57.short
- Eng, L.L., Hong, K.F. and Ho, Y.K. (2011) The Relation between Financial Statement Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital of Singapore firms. Accounting Research Journal, 3, 288-307. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1609709
- Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983) Separation of Owner and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325. https://wwz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/wwz/redaktion/Summer_School/ 2013/Yermack/Fama___Jensen_1983.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467037
- Forker, J.J. (1992) Corporate Governance and Disclosure Quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 111-124. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-PZDG201102008.htm
- Hunton, J.E., Hoitash, R. and Thibodeau, J.C. (2011) The Relationship between Perceived Tone at the Top and Earnings Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 1190-1224.
- Jenson, M.C. and Meckling, J.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
- Bedard, J.C. and Johnstone, K.M. (2004) Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decisions. The Accounting Review, 4, 227-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.277 http://www.aaajournals.org/doi/abs/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.277