Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Case Study on Distribution of Responsibilities for the Civil Case of False Card Fraudulent Trading
Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China
- 1 Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
In recent years, bank card has come more and more necessary in people’s daily life, however it also has the hidden risk. Who should be responsible for the loss when the bank cards in our hand are used by criminals as a tool of accumulating money? In this paper, we will carry out case studies to find a solution plan on the distribution of responsibilities in the civil case of false card fraudulent trading by analyzing the current situation of distribution of the responsibilities.
KeywordsFalse Card Fraudulent TradingCivil ResponsibilityDistribution of Evidential Burden
- Yang, L.X. and Wang, L.F. (2015) The Liability of the Damage by Fraudulent Use of Credit Card from the Perspective of Law.
- Zhang, J. (2015) Discussion on Quasi-Possession’s Application in Deposit Contract in Bank’s View to the Third Person’s “Good-Faith”. Legal System and Society, 4.
- Peng, J.H., Pan, F. and Li, X.H. (2012) Distribution of Evidential Burden and Responsibilities for the Civil Case of False Card Fraudulent Trading. Rule of Law Forum, 3.
- Cheng, S. and Huang, H.W. (2012) Research on Bank’s Duty to Protect Depositor’s Interest—In the Case of a Depositor’s Win to the Bank about Stolen Deposit.
- Sun, X.L. Discussion on Bank’s Duty for Security—In the Case of Steal by a Clone Bank Card. Journal of Commerce of Tianjin University, 2.