Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Is the Tokyo Foreign Exchange Market Efficient from Two Perspectives of Forward Bias and Anomaly?
- 1
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper examines the efficiency of the Tokyo Foreign Exchange Market from two perspectives. One is whether or not forward bias in this market has existed and the other is the effect of interventions in the market with a focus on whether or not a day-of-the-week anomaly exists in it. Empirical results show that forward exchange rates are a biased predictor of future spot exchange rates; however, there are some anomalies in the market. The findings suggest the conclusion that this market has not been completely efficient.
KeywordsAnomalyExchange RateForeign Exchange MarketIntervention
- N. Yamori, Y. Kurihara, “The day-of-the-week effect in foreign exchange markets: multi-currency evidence,” Research in International Business and Finance 18(1), 2004, PP. 51-57
- R. Fatum, M.M. Hutchison, “Effectiveness of official daily foreign exchange market intervention operations in Japan,” NBER Working Paper, 9648, 2003.
- R. Fatum, J. Pedersen, “Real-time effects of central bank intervention in the euro market,” Journal of International Economics, 78(1), 2009, PP. 11-25.
- J. Aguilar, S. Nydalh, “Central Bank Intervention and Exchange Rate: the Case of Sweden,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 10, 2000, PP. 303-322.
- H. Louis, L. P. Blenman, J. S. Thatcher, “Interest rate parity and the behavior of the bid-ask spread,” The Journal of Financial Research 22(2), 1999, PP. 189-200.
- D. Cook, “The puzzling dual of the uncovered interest parity puzzle evidence from Pacific Rim capital flows,” International Review of Economics and Finance 18(3), 2009, PP. 449-460.
- J. A. Batten, P. G. Szilagyi, “Is covered interest parity arbitrage extinct? Evidence from the spot USD/Yen,” Applied Economics Letters, 17(3), 2010, PP. 283-287.
- W. M. Fong, G. Valente, J. K. W. Fung, “Covered interest arbitrage profits: The role of liquidity and credit risk,”Journal of Banking and Finance Amsterdam 34(5), 2010, PP. 1098-1110.
- M. Smith, A. Pitts, “Foreign Exchange Intervention by the Bank of Japan: Bayesian Analysis Using a Bivariate Stochastic Volatility Model,”Econometric Reviews 25(2/3), 2006, PP. 425-440.
- S. Kim, J. Sheen, “Interventions in the Yen-dollar spot market: A story of price, volatility and volume,” Journal of Banking and Finance30(11), 2006, PP. 3191-3210.
- A. Chari, “Heterogeneous Market-Making in Foreign Exchange Markets: Evidence from Individual Bank Responses to Central Bank Interventions,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39(5), 2007, PP.1131-1145.
- S. Bertoli, M. Giampiero, G. G. Ricchiuti, “Exchange market pressure: Some caveats in empirical applications,”Applied Economics, 42, 2011, PP. 24-35.
- M. K. A. Shah, Z. Hyder, M. K. Pervaiz, “Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility in Pakistan: an analysis using GARCH-V model,” Applied Financial Economics, 19, 2009, PP. 1497-1508.
- F. Breedon, P. Vitale, “An empirical study of portfolio-balance and information effects of order flow on exchange rates,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(3), 2010, PP. 504-520.