The Retailers’ Choices of Profit Strategies in a Cournot Duopoly: Relative Profit and Pure Profit
- 1 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
To investigate the influence of the relative performance on retailers’ choices of profit strategies, a Cournot competition model composed of two private retailers is proposed, in which retailers are facing the problem of choosing a strategy from pure profit and relative profit. The study shows that, 1) when its competitor pursues relative profit, the retailer will adopt pure profit strategy if the degree of relative performance of its competitor is high enough. Otherwise, the retailer will adopt the relative profit strategy. 2) The more relative profit-maximizing retailers there are, the more intense market competition will be, the lower market price will decrease. 3) Under a certain degree of relative performance, the strategy profiles (relative profit, relative profit), (relative profit, pure profit) and (pure profit, relative profit) are all likely to be Nash equilibrium, except the strategy profile (pure profit, pure profit).
- Miller, N.H. and Pazgal, A.I. (2001) The Equivalence of Price and Quantity Competition with Delegation. RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 284-301. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696410
- Miller, N. and Pazgal, A. (2002) Relative Performance as a Strategic Commitment Mechanism. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1045
- Vega-Redondo, F. (1997) The Evolution of Walrasian Behavior. Econometrica, 65, 375-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171898
- Lu, Y. (2011) The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective of Private Firms and Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly. The Singapore Economic Review, 56, 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590811004201
- Nakamura, Y. (2015) Price versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly: The Case of Relative Profit Maximization. Economic Modelling, 44, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.019
- Jansen, T., van Lier, A. and van Witteloostuijn, A. (2009) On the Impact of Managerial Bonus Systems on Firm Profit and Market Competition: The Cases of Pure Profit, Sales, Market Share and Relative Profits Compared. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1437
- Kou, Z. and Zhou, M. (2015) Hotelling’s Competition with Relative Performance Evaluation. Economics Letters, 130, 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.011
- Matsumura, T. and Matsushima, N. (2012) Competitiveness and Stability of Collusive Behavior. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64, s22-s31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2012.00439.x
- Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. and Cato, S. (2013) Competitiveness and R&D Competition Revisited. Economic modelling, 31, 541-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.016
- Kolstad, J.T. (2013) Information and Quality When Motivation Is Intrinsic: Evidence from Surgeon Report Cards. The American Economic Review, 103, 2875-2910. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.7.2875