The Influence of Product Market Externality on Dynamic Decisions of Monopoly
- 1 Department of Economics and Management, Sichuan College of Architectural Technology, Deyang, China
- 2 School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Abstract
The externality of the goods in the market affects the diffusion process of the product, and also affects the price strategy and advertising strategy that manufacturer makes in the diffusion process of the product. Positive externalitiy can accelerate the speed of the product diffusion, increase product sales, and save the cost of advertising in order to increase enterprise’s profit; Strong negative externality reduces product sales, increases enterprise’s advertising costs and makes losses. Under the market of the monopoly structure, considering the effect of products’ externality, product price and advertising investment on the product’s demand, builds the dynamic decision model of the product and uses the control theory to get the manufacturer’s optimal price strategy and optimal controlling strategy of the advertisement expenditure, and relatively analysis the changing trend of optimal controlling strategy, the product’s diffusion process and manufacturer’s profit on the different condition of positive and negative externality, and obtains some conclusions which are provides theory support for the decision enterprise makes.
- Bass, F.M. (1969) A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durable Goods. Management Science, 13, 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
- Kalis, S. and Sen, S.K. (1986) Diffusion Models and the Marketing Mix for Single Products. In: Mahajan, V. and Wind, Y., Eds., Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance, MA. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, 20-30.
- Jain, D. and Rao, R.C. (1990) Effect of Price on Demand for Durable: Modeling, Estimation and Findings. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8, 163-170.
- Xie, J.H. and Marvin, S. (1995) Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externality. Management Science, 41, 909-926. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.5.909
- Richard, S. (1994) Quality Regulation of Durable Goods in the Presence of Externality. Stanford University, California.
- Austan, G. and Edward, M.L. (2000) Coveting the Neighbor’s Manufacturing: The Dilemma of State Income Apportionment. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00036-5
- Didier, L., Montmarin, M.D. and Van, L.N. (2004) Dynamic Duopoly with Congestion Effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 655-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.02.001
- Jonah, B., Alan, T.S. and Scott, J.R. (2010) Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales. Marketing Science, 29, 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0557
- Pan, X.J., Chen, H.M. and Hou, H.Y. (2006) Monopoly Pricing Strategy with Network Externality. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 20, 67-71.
- Manchanda, P., Xie, Y. and Youn, N. (2008) The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption. Marketing Science, 27, 961-976. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0354
- Bing, J. (2011) Social Learning and Dynamic Pricing of Durable Goods. Marketing Science, 6, 1-14.
- Nielsen (2009) Global Advertising Consumers Trust Real Friends and Virtual Strangers the Most. Newswire (Blog), July 7. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2009/global-advertising- consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most.html
- Nielsen (2012) How Connectivity Influences Global Shopping. Newswire (Blog), August 28. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/how-connectivity- influences-global-shopping.html